Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "synchroniz".
Did you mean:
synchronize
2008 May 30
2
Web-based shared calendar synchronizable with Outlook
Hi,
I know this request is a a little off-topic but may be interesting for
dovecot users (at least i hope!)
Does anybody has already had an experience with a calendar sharing
solution including a webcalendar and an outlook connector, "compatible"
with dovecot ?
Today, there are many projects aiming to be a "M$ Exchange Killer" (such
as Zimbra, OBM, open-exchange, etc) but
2007 Aug 24
2
error in rails 1.2.3 activerecord
...1.8/gems/rake-0.7.2/lib/rake.rb:399:in
`each''
c:/ruby186/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.2/lib/rake.rb:399:in
`execute''
c:/ruby186/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.2/lib/rake.rb:369:in
`invoke''
c:/ruby186/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.2/lib/rake.rb:362:in
`synchroniz
e''
c:/ruby186/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.2/lib/rake.rb:362:in
`invoke''
c:/ruby186/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.2.3/lib/tasks/databases.rake:76
c:/ruby186/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.2/lib/rake.rb:399:in
`call''
c:/ruby186/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ge...
2016 Jan 15
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
...nstruction completes" provides the equivalent
> of ARM/Power A-cumulativity, which can be thought of as transitivity
> backwards in time.
I couldn't make that leap. In particular, the manual's "Detailed
Description" sections explicitly refer to program-order:
Every synchronizable specified memory instruction (loads or stores or
both) that occurs in the instruction stream before the SYNC
instruction must reach a stage in the load/store datapath after which
no instruction re-ordering is possible before any synchronizable
specified memory instruction which occurs a...
2016 Jan 15
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
...nstruction completes" provides the equivalent
> of ARM/Power A-cumulativity, which can be thought of as transitivity
> backwards in time.
I couldn't make that leap. In particular, the manual's "Detailed
Description" sections explicitly refer to program-order:
Every synchronizable specified memory instruction (loads or stores or
both) that occurs in the instruction stream before the SYNC
instruction must reach a stage in the load/store datapath after which
no instruction re-ordering is possible before any synchronizable
specified memory instruction which occurs a...
2005 Dec 16
11
mysql mem-tables vs. memcached
...e elaborate on the technical differences and practical
impact of whether choosing memory-based tables in MySQL or using memcached.
I got this far on my own:
It seems that MySQL uses the NDB engine for transaction-safe memory access
in a cluster. the memory storage engine seems to be faster but not
synchronizable by any means in a cluster. memcached seems to be ultimately
fast
but requires extra effort in your code.
Who got experience on that?
Best regards
Peter
2016 Jan 15
0
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
...the equivalent
> > of ARM/Power A-cumulativity, which can be thought of as transitivity
> > backwards in time.
>
> I couldn't make that leap. In particular, the manual's "Detailed
> Description" sections explicitly refer to program-order:
>
> Every synchronizable specified memory instruction (loads or stores or
> both) that occurs in the instruction stream before the SYNC
> instruction must reach a stage in the load/store datapath after which
> no instruction re-ordering is possible before any synchronizable
> specified memory instru...
2016 Jan 14
3
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On 01/14/2016 01:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>> On 01/14/2016 12:34 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>
>>> The WRC+addr+addr is OK because data dependencies are not required to be
>>> transitive, in other words, they are not required to flow from one CPU to
>>> another without the help of an explicit memory barrier.
>> I don't see any
2016 Jan 14
3
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On 01/14/2016 01:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>> On 01/14/2016 12:34 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>
>>> The WRC+addr+addr is OK because data dependencies are not required to be
>>> transitive, in other words, they are not required to flow from one CPU to
>>> another without the help of an explicit memory barrier.
>> I don't see any
2006 Mar 24
1
R crashes when loading library/package; Windows, Cygwin
...enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-version-specific-runt
ime-libs --without-x --enable-libgcj --disable-java-awt --with-system-zlib --ena
ble-interpreter --disable-libgcj-debug --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=b
oehm --disable-win32-registry --enable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-hash-synchroniza
tion --enable-libstdcxx-debug : (reconfigured)
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.4 (cygming special) (gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125)
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread
(with 21 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
Copyright 1987-2006, Larry Wall
Binary...