search for: symon

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "symon".

Did you mean: simon
2001 Nov 02
5
What about Control Panel?
I have a no-windows Wine configuration. What happens if I install an application that a.o. adds a module to the Windows Control Panel? Is there a fake Control Panel for this?
2016 Jun 10
0
Patches for adding 120 ms encoding
...d with figure (for AMR-NB but the same holds for Opus). https://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg112/Hard_Software_Components/Software/hoene_07_2004_paper.pdf Von: Felicia Lim [mailto:flim at google.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Juni 2016 16:59 An: Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com> Betreff: Re: [opus] Patches for adding 120 ms encoding Yes, that's right. In that case, a longer frame size means that we can reduce header overhead. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:45 PM Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com <mailto:christian.hoene at symonics.com...
2013 Sep 05
2
Enquiry into .Opus Audio Quality
2013 Jul 26
4
Some listening test results
...downloaded here <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults More will be added soon. Thanks to Patrick Schreiner and Alfons Martin, who did the tests. With best regards, Christian Hoene Symonics GmbH Sand 13 72076 T?bingen Tel +49 7071 5681302 Fax +49 7071 5681309 Email: <mailto:christian.hoene at symonics.com> christian.hoene at symonics.com Gesch?ftsf?hrer/Presidents: Michael Haun, Dr. Christian Hoene, Patrick Schreiner Sitz der Gesellschaft/Place of Business: T?binge...
2016 Jun 02
3
Patches for adding 120 ms encoding
On 06/01/2016 02:06 PM, Felicia Lim wrote: > That was my intention with refactoring out the subframe encoding and > repacketizing bit. Or do you mean I should merge the explicit check for > 120 ms frame and the existing checks for 40/60 ms wideband? What I mean is that this line in opus_encoder.c: if (frame_size > st->Fs/50 && (st->mode == MODE_CELT_ONLY ||
2016 Apr 19
0
Channel Mapping Family for Ambisonics
...bisonics > [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-14#section-5.1.1 > > > Thanks for your input, > Michael Graczyk > _______________________________________________ > opus mailing list > opus at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus -- Symonics GmbH Geierweg 25 72144 Dußlingen Tel +49 7072 8006100 Fax +49 7072 8006109 Email: christian.hoene at symonics.com Geschäftsführer/President: Dr. Christian Hoene Sitz der Gesellschaft/Place of Business: Tübingen Registereintrag/Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 739918
2012 Apr 04
5
Simple code dosn't work
I think you have a syntactical error on the line thats throwing the error, you state: > j.even?should be true #throws an error on j == 2, j == 4 should this line not read as: j.even?.should be true -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2016 Apr 18
5
Channel Mapping Family for Ambisonics
Hello, We (Google) have been experimenting with configuration and adjustments to CELT-only Opus that give good results for compressing ambisonic audio signals [1]. Based on our results so far, we would like to use Opus to encode spatial audio. We hope to make it easy/possible to use libopus with other common tools and software modules (ffmpeg/libav in particular). Based on my reading of the
2013 Dec 17
2
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
...ert but it seemed like the only optimisation they were using was -O2 but perhaps there is something else set. Do not want to claim a regression when it may be my own fault. Thanks for your response. Best Regards, Stuart Marsden On 17 December 2013 11:04, Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com>wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > > > you are compressing it at 6kbit/s. Then, then SILK mode is probability > used and the Silk mode is much faster than CELT. Do you also some figures > at 64kbit/s? > > > > It is strange that Opus 1.1 got slower in the Silk mode ?...
2013 Dec 17
0
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
...y the > comparison again. > > Stuart > > Best Regards, > > Stuart Marsden > > Tactical Communications Consultant > FinMars Consulting Ltd > UK: +441865589833 > Finland: +358453046287 > > > On 17 December 2013 16:53, Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com>wrote: > >> Hi Stuart, >> >> >> >> what happens if you do the tests with complexity 0? >> >> >> >> With best regards, >> >> >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* opus-bo...
2001 Oct 14
1
Word and ppt viewers work with Wine???
Installation of the Microsoft Word viewer (97/2000) and Powerpoint viewer fail in the second dialog of the installation wizard. I'm using a Wine configuration (latest Codeweavers) without any original Windows DLLs. Does anyone have a working config with these two apps?
2013 Oct 04
0
ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool
In that case, can you please suggest a reliable tool? Thanks, Rhishi From: Christian Hoene [mailto:christian.hoene at symonics.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 17:30 To: Rhishikesh Agashe; opus at xiph.org Cc: Rasmi Mishra Subject: AW: [opus] ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool Hi Rhishi, PQevalaudio is very unreliable and buggy. I have compared to PEAQ and - as a result...
2013 Oct 04
1
ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool
Hi Rhishi, PQevalaudio is very unreliable and buggy. I have compared to PEAQ and - as a result - now I am not using it anymore. With best regards, Christian Hoene Von: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] Im Auftrag von Rhishikesh Agashe Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013 12:35 An: opus at xiph.org Cc: Rasmi Mishra Betreff: [opus] ODG (Objective Difference
2013 Oct 04
3
ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool
Hi, I checked the ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for a few reference vectors using the PQEvalAudio Tool and found that some of them show ODG scores as high as -3.5 If we look at the range as described in the link below, it looks unacceptable. http://www-mmsp.ece.mcgill.ca/documents/Software/Packages/AFsp/PQevalAudio.html Am I missing something or are these scores valid? Thanks and
2013 Dec 16
4
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
I have just started trying Opus with a view to using it in a project. I am interested in embedded hardware and tried it on the Raspberry Pi using the raspbian distro. The version of libopus in the repos is 0.9.14. I installed this and tried encoding 2 minutes of speech from a librevox recording. It managed this at a respectable pace for complexity 10: Skipping chunk of type "LIST",
2005 Jul 28
2
Question about the identification header
Hi, I'm writing a little API in java that read/write ogg's comments (in the comment header), as well as reading the information header. All the "read" part is done and is working well, but I am having a little problem while coding the "write" part of the API. In the docs (I use http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html#id4726648), I founded everything
2005 Aug 03
0
[ANNOUNCE] Finally released a first beta ... =)
Hi, Maybe you remember, I needed help for writing a little java api for editing ogg comments' tags. I just have released on sourceforge the code I wrote for my need, for the case somebody would need it. The standalone version contains the standalone API binaries, and the bundle version contains the sources and a little GUI for testing the API. I would have liked the code to be cleaner,
2013 Jul 22
0
WG: [87all] IETF 87 Technical Plenary Experiment
-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: [87all] IETF 87 Technical Plenary Experiment Datum: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:15:23 -0700 Von: IAB Chair <mailto:iab-chair at ietf.org> <iab-chair at ietf.org> Antwort an: ietf at ietf.org An: 87all at ietf.org The OPUS codec, defined in RFC 6716, can scale from low bit-rate narrowband speech to very high quality stereo
2013 Dec 17
0
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
Hi Stuart, you are compressing it at 6kbit/s. Then, then SILK mode is probability used and the Silk mode is much faster than CELT. Do you also some figures at 64kbit/s? It is strange that Opus 1.1 got slower in the Silk mode - may the speech/voice selection adds some overhead. I would be interested in seeing the performance of the 64 kbit/s in both Opus 1.0 and Opus 1.1. With best