Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "symon".
Did you mean:
simon
2001 Nov 02
5
What about Control Panel?
I have a no-windows Wine configuration.
What happens if I install an application that a.o. adds a module to the
Windows Control Panel? Is there a fake Control Panel for this?
2016 Jun 10
0
Patches for adding 120 ms encoding
...d with figure (for AMR-NB but the same holds for Opus).
https://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg112/Hard_Software_Components/Software/hoene_07_2004_paper.pdf
Von: Felicia Lim [mailto:flim at google.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Juni 2016 16:59
An: Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com>
Betreff: Re: [opus] Patches for adding 120 ms encoding
Yes, that's right. In that case, a longer frame size means that we can reduce header overhead.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:45 PM Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com <mailto:christian.hoene at symonics.com...
2013 Sep 05
2
Enquiry into .Opus Audio Quality
2013 Jul 26
4
Some listening test results
...downloaded here
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults>
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults
More will be added soon.
Thanks to Patrick Schreiner and Alfons Martin, who did the tests.
With best regards,
Christian Hoene
Symonics GmbH
Sand 13
72076 T?bingen
Tel +49 7071 5681302
Fax +49 7071 5681309
Email: <mailto:christian.hoene at symonics.com> christian.hoene at symonics.com
Gesch?ftsf?hrer/Presidents: Michael Haun, Dr. Christian Hoene, Patrick
Schreiner
Sitz der Gesellschaft/Place of Business: T?binge...
2016 Jun 02
3
Patches for adding 120 ms encoding
On 06/01/2016 02:06 PM, Felicia Lim wrote:
> That was my intention with refactoring out the subframe encoding and
> repacketizing bit. Or do you mean I should merge the explicit check for
> 120 ms frame and the existing checks for 40/60 ms wideband?
What I mean is that this line in opus_encoder.c:
if (frame_size > st->Fs/50 && (st->mode == MODE_CELT_ONLY ||
2016 Apr 19
0
Channel Mapping Family for Ambisonics
...bisonics
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-14#section-5.1.1
>
>
> Thanks for your input,
> Michael Graczyk
> _______________________________________________
> opus mailing list
> opus at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
--
Symonics GmbH
Geierweg 25
72144 Dußlingen
Tel +49 7072 8006100
Fax +49 7072 8006109
Email: christian.hoene at symonics.com
Geschäftsführer/President: Dr. Christian Hoene
Sitz der Gesellschaft/Place of Business: Tübingen
Registereintrag/Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 739918
2012 Apr 04
5
Simple code dosn't work
I think you have a syntactical error on the line thats throwing the
error, you state:
> j.even?should be true #throws an error on j == 2, j == 4
should this line not read as:
j.even?.should be true
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2016 Apr 18
5
Channel Mapping Family for Ambisonics
Hello,
We (Google) have been experimenting with configuration and adjustments to
CELT-only Opus that give good results for compressing ambisonic audio
signals [1]. Based on our results so far, we would like to use Opus to
encode spatial audio. We hope to make it easy/possible to use libopus with
other common tools and software modules (ffmpeg/libav in particular).
Based on my reading of the
2013 Dec 17
2
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
...ert but it seemed like the
only optimisation they were using was -O2 but perhaps there is something
else set. Do not want to claim a regression when it may be my own fault.
Thanks for your response.
Best Regards,
Stuart Marsden
On 17 December 2013 11:04, Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com>wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
>
>
> you are compressing it at 6kbit/s. Then, then SILK mode is probability
> used and the Silk mode is much faster than CELT. Do you also some figures
> at 64kbit/s?
>
>
>
> It is strange that Opus 1.1 got slower in the Silk mode ?...
2013 Dec 17
0
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
...y the
> comparison again.
>
> Stuart
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Stuart Marsden
>
> Tactical Communications Consultant
> FinMars Consulting Ltd
> UK: +441865589833
> Finland: +358453046287
>
>
> On 17 December 2013 16:53, Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Stuart,
>>
>>
>>
>> what happens if you do the tests with complexity 0?
>>
>>
>>
>> With best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* opus-bo...
2001 Oct 14
1
Word and ppt viewers work with Wine???
Installation of the Microsoft Word viewer (97/2000) and Powerpoint viewer
fail in the second dialog of the installation wizard.
I'm using a Wine configuration (latest Codeweavers) without any original
Windows DLLs.
Does anyone have a working config with these two apps?
2013 Oct 04
0
ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool
In that case, can you please suggest a reliable tool?
Thanks,
Rhishi
From: Christian Hoene [mailto:christian.hoene at symonics.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 17:30
To: Rhishikesh Agashe; opus at xiph.org
Cc: Rasmi Mishra
Subject: AW: [opus] ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool
Hi Rhishi,
PQevalaudio is very unreliable and buggy. I have compared to PEAQ and - as a result...
2013 Oct 04
1
ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool
Hi Rhishi,
PQevalaudio is very unreliable and buggy. I have compared to PEAQ and - as a
result - now I am not using it anymore.
With best regards,
Christian Hoene
Von: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] Im Auftrag von
Rhishikesh Agashe
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013 12:35
An: opus at xiph.org
Cc: Rasmi Mishra
Betreff: [opus] ODG (Objective Difference
2013 Oct 04
3
ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool
Hi,
I checked the ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for a few reference vectors using the PQEvalAudio Tool and found that some of them show ODG scores as high as -3.5
If we look at the range as described in the link below, it looks unacceptable.
http://www-mmsp.ece.mcgill.ca/documents/Software/Packages/AFsp/PQevalAudio.html
Am I missing something or are these scores valid?
Thanks and
2013 Dec 16
4
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
I have just started trying Opus with a view to using it in a project. I am
interested in embedded hardware and tried it on the Raspberry Pi using the
raspbian distro.
The version of libopus in the repos is 0.9.14. I installed this and tried
encoding 2 minutes of speech from a librevox recording. It managed this at
a respectable pace for complexity 10:
Skipping chunk of type "LIST",
2005 Jul 28
2
Question about the identification header
Hi,
I'm writing a little API in java that read/write ogg's comments (in the
comment header), as well as reading the information header. All the
"read" part is done and is working well, but I am having a little
problem while coding the "write" part of the API.
In the docs (I use
http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html#id4726648), I
founded everything
2005 Aug 03
0
[ANNOUNCE] Finally released a first beta ... =)
Hi,
Maybe you remember, I needed help for writing a little java api for
editing ogg comments' tags. I just have released on sourceforge the code
I wrote for my need, for the case somebody would need it.
The standalone version contains the standalone API binaries, and the
bundle version contains the sources and a little GUI for testing the
API. I would have liked the code to be cleaner,
2013 Jul 22
0
WG: [87all] IETF 87 Technical Plenary Experiment
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff:
[87all] IETF 87 Technical Plenary Experiment
Datum:
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:15:23 -0700
Von:
IAB Chair <mailto:iab-chair at ietf.org> <iab-chair at ietf.org>
Antwort an:
ietf at ietf.org
An:
87all at ietf.org
The OPUS codec, defined in RFC 6716, can scale from low bit-rate
narrowband speech to very high quality stereo
2013 Dec 17
0
1.1 Much slower on Raspberry Pi
Hi Stuart,
you are compressing it at 6kbit/s. Then, then SILK mode is probability used
and the Silk mode is much faster than CELT. Do you also some figures at
64kbit/s?
It is strange that Opus 1.1 got slower in the Silk mode - may the
speech/voice selection adds some overhead. I would be interested in seeing
the performance of the 64 kbit/s in both Opus 1.0 and Opus 1.1.
With best