Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "symmetrytest".
Did you mean:
symmetrytests
2009 Oct 14
3
post-hoc test with kruskal.test()
Dear R users,
I would like to know if there is a way in R to execute a post-hoc test
(factor levels comparison, like Tukey for ANOVA) of a non-parametric
analysis of variance with kruskal.test() function. I am comparing three
different groups. The preliminary analysis using the kruskal-wallis-test
show significance, but I still don''t know the relationship and the
significance level
2009 Feb 11
1
Hollander's test of bivariate symmetry
Does anyone know if any R package has a function that will conduct
Hollander's test of bivariate symmetry?
(Hollander, Biometrika, 1971)
Either the exact test or an asymptotic version would be sufficient for my
purposes.
Thanks.
Joe Boyer
Statistical Sciences
Renaissance Bldg 510, 3233-D
Mail Stop RN0320
8-275-3661
cell: (610) 209-8531
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Sep 21
1
Post-Hoc tests for Friedman Test?
Hi there all,
This is my first post to the list and I'll first say a few things:
- R is great!
- The archives of this list have helped me solve all of my
problems/questions so far
- I only know enough statistics "to be dangerous"
I'm looking for a way to do post-hoc tests for the Friedman test. I
have a dataset from a within-subjects design with 5 conditions where
some of
2016 Feb 11
2
inconsistency in treatment of USE.NAMES argument
...R:110
/OpenMx/R/MxNamespace.R:702
/OrthoPanels/R/opm.R:167
/XML2R/R/utils.R:16
/assertive.base/tests/testthat/test-utils.R:14
/bigrquery/R/utils.r:13
/bold/R/zzz.R:29
/checkmate/R/checkList.r:56
/coin/R/ExactDistributions.R:80
/coin/R/ExactDistributions.R:97
/coin/R/ExactDistributions.R:234
/coin/R/SymmetryTests.R:217
/copula/R/aux-acopula.R:950
/covr/R/data_frame.R:13
/covr/R/display_name.R:40
/cplm/R/lme4_lmer.R:423
/crunch/R/batches.R:71
/crunch/R/batches.R:102
/crunch/R/categorical-array.R:87
/crunch/R/hide-variables.R:78
/crunch/R/misc.R:68
/crunch/R/share.R:11
/crunch/R/shoji-catalog.R:39
/crunch/R/...
2016 Feb 08
2
inconsistency in treatment of USE.NAMES argument
Hi,
Both vapply() and sapply() support the 'USE.NAMES' argument. According
to the man page:
USE.NAMES: logical; if ?TRUE? and if ?X? is character, use ?X? as
?names? for the result unless it had names already.
But if 'X' has names already and 'USE.NAMES' is FALSE, it's not clear
what will happen to the names. Are they going to propagate to the
result