Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "sym_tab".
Did you mean:
sym_hcb
2004 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-test portability failures
...=======================
/usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/scan_line.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory
/usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/sym_tab.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory
/usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl.c:116: error: conflicting types for 'setprogname'
/usr/home/cfe/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/i386-unknown-freebsd5.3/3.4-llvm/include/...
2004 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-test portability failures
...========
>
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/scan_line.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/sym_tab.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory
>
> /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl.c:116: error: conflicting types for 'setprogname'
> /usr/home/cfe/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/i386-unknown-freebsd5.3/3....
2007 Aug 02
4
[PATCH][ELF] Correct space calculation for symtab when BSD_SYMTAB=yes
Hi!
If there is a string table for section headers, it also gets loaded.
Therefore take it into account in size calculation for kernel symtab.
Also there is no need to call elf_set_verbose() a second time
after elf_init() (First call happens within elf_init()).
Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Keir: Can you also apply changeset 15672 and this patch
to Xen
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...0 0.01 5536 0 0.01 5536
sumarraymalloc.ll 5 8625 0 0.01 8613 0 0.01 8613
sumcol.ll 15 21294 0 0.01 21269 0 0.01 21269
support.ll 10 85089 0 0.01 85055 0 0.01 85055
susan.ll 21 617846 0 0.06 617812 0 0.06 617812
symbol.ll 10 28263 0 0.01 28234 0 0.01 28521
symm.ll 12 28959 0 0.01 28911 0 0.01 28911
sym_tab.ll 3 9832 0 0.01 9802 0 0.01 9802
symtab.ll 5 13680 0 0.01 13654 0 0.01 13654
Synchronization.ll 2 8448 0 0.01 8420 0 0.01 8420
syr2k.ll 12 29029 0 0.01 28980 0 0.01 28980
syrk.ll 12 25741 0 0.01 25693 0 0.01 25693
sysspec.ll 13 18074 0 0.01 18058 0 0.01 18058
System.ll 2 951 0 0.01 923 0 0.01 923...