search for: sxslt

...have been looking a bit at docbook as an alternative to latex. However, Sweave is a very nice way to deal with documents mixing R code, figures, and text as well as markup. I saw a couple of references in the email archives that people have been experimenting with combinations of tools (including Sxslt). Is anyone willing to share their thoughts and practices in basically replacing the functionality of Sweave and Latex with an xml-based solution like docbook? Thanks, Sean

Our current intention is to no longer include Rversion.h from R.h as from R 1.6.0 (which is months away). Package maintainers when revising code might like to check if they actually use Rversion.h, and if so include it explicitly. I did a quick grep through the CRAN packages, and in all but one case (mda) the test is for R < 1.2.0, so it may be simplest just to tidy up and add `Depends: R

My university provides me with a powerful course management system for the courses that I teach. Among other things I can create a wiki for the course, which is very convenient for cross-linking different bits of the course. Naturally I use R extensively in my teaching and I want to incorporate R code, output and graphics in such a wiki. If I were producing LaTeX sources instead of HTML sources