Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "swu".
Did you mean:
sw
2005 Aug 19
3
WEBrick OS X StartupItem?
Is it possible to create a Startup Item for WEBrick? My startup item,
named swu, works fine when I run it from the command line, just not
when the computer is starting up. I''m wondering if some resources are
missing for ruby to load at this point... or something. Here''s output
from /var/log/system.log... Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Aug 18 21:18:...
2015 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
...ns and having add produce real UB I can see is that as soon as we start moving instructions around (specifically moving the add to a place it does not dominate or moving any other instruction over the add) we change the add to an instruction that does not produce real UB anymore; something like add swu = “add signed wrap gives undef”...
>
> - Matthias
>
>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been discussing a model with David that might steer poison back towards
>>> something that simply s...
2015 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
...ns and having add produce real UB I can see is that as soon as we start moving instructions around (specifically moving the add to a place it does not dominate or moving any other instruction over the add) we change the add to an instruction that does not produce real UB anymore; something like add swu = “add signed wrap gives undef”...
- Matthias
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been discussing a model with David that might steer poison back towards
>> something that simply supports algebraic simplifica...
2015 Jan 29
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
> I've been discussing a model with David that might steer poison back towards
> something that simply supports algebraic simplification. If we have a math
> operation that cannot wrap, then it notionally produces as many bits of
> undef as the operation could possibly produce. For example, "add nsw i8" can
> produce an i9 undef, and "mul nsw i8" can produce
2015 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
...ns and having add produce real UB I can see is that as soon as we start moving instructions around (specifically moving the add to a place it does not dominate or moving any other instruction over the add) we change the add to an instruction that does not produce real UB anymore; something like add swu = “add signed wrap gives undef”...
>>
>> - Matthias
>>
>>>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been discussing a model with David that might steer poison back towards
&...
2015 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
...ns and having add produce real UB I can see is that as soon as we start moving instructions around (specifically moving the add to a place it does not dominate or moving any other instruction over the add) we change the add to an instruction that does not produce real UB anymore; something like add swu = “add signed wrap gives undef”...
>>>
>>> - Matthias
>>>
>>>>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been discussing a model with David that might steer...
2015 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
...ns and having add produce real UB I can see is that as soon as we start moving instructions around (specifically moving the add to a place it does not dominate or moving any other instruction over the add) we change the add to an instruction that does not produce real UB anymore; something like add swu = “add signed wrap gives undef”...
>>>>
>>>> - Matthias
>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been discussing a model with...
2014 Jun 24
3
[PATCH 1/2] Drop dosutil/mdiskchk.com
...}_wO)NMrEGp#!`Vqqx+oeSOn`3a^FMzy$=4G&?`o)zSx&ZSAFQ3xtK
z!FtF>ViU3`f?X=;f+|y`U|~B4&0a2$QW?OxAvRUk72c#RJ0c^)G{JGtbxd)=&1;(X
zZ}7YIybZX~Pgp1;$&8=LIzMy-+1Tc752|b#g8$4TBOjZ*rVCo?4)&^=!_-w6T;;2e
zV7Co+c8+FZ5I(DKSC9b!D!VLX7H#wS$r#4Y;?@8*xI1YBM}6)hl=0uhdpV+H*V#_r
zPy|nQI?;#SU!Eiv%swu^B=KV(?S5qfnV(4iJ(mOz)6$`T-E2lwO`kVklf5>>-9T(o
zTpnC~d4 at 6M<rT&7@)GfcpA^$s!OC9TP#X>O&r~g$vyg^?fea3-ZL$rCY=Lq6Y(Qv-
zKx6>z^z(z}&Yz?0aVkbotXOSZG89V|+7N{VB0zK{O(~D)r*oRhb<z%IsAZx+JqnG1
z&(x)8f}k2Don-=8Qckcm0Aor(+bT<w;%`ma4=lG#G>9noJfw0p^>-q!HT&U!>p6P`...
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...{joiG>HH?m89ZEaZjsm0xU6?sZ~mK62x*|%5s44mI13E$epskHyV
z9?~b0yv2P=i%RY&?3Donl)xFzj-9MxpLh8kMJ4@<`}X12w(ltZ(>>xV4;3g&AbDfZ
z9YTWjsVT2__32ycDfD#f+pBL$PNUCK!Z~H)AQFK*VsB&zl=O0WYQ17h6w~31MP1Sn
zGH1|XPo+cNUtqUQi5_PJK`ZRuUBhBZFD)tT)4xaGlHQ(fJq!EXQj`{bDP<n}Qi}T&
zm!gxs`}Ha+Epo?SWU-Q>-hJ;VV&)okbsbPz+P9BKTwyuOq!Aaliq4`tQNDj^VQG=!
z8{x-h02RsTR#H at 03Q<KXPA^Y-I)KXifrpt&#l at vqai3ebb?@gkb49%+r7n|4UWPeE
zcZ&;q75}BkRV1d*Y}zTWDP`L(2+$g9ckvm-I^8<08jJdLw{*Rzrh at h??p~zJdURPs
zYQK^q(G}F&y>FkQl!QkUDcuH?^zU2Z8PKmgnsl4*90tgb6)7ke>zODPTSdIM4|J@!
zJGX9QsL(w...