Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "switch16".
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/2] Transparent entry.S IRQ holdoff handling
...$4, %esp
-1: iret
+1: IRET
.section .fixup,"ax"
iret_exc:
- sti
+ STI
pushl $0 # no error code
pushl $do_iret_error
jmp error_code
@@ -299,14 +298,14 @@ ldt_ss:
* CPUs, which we can try to work around to make
* dosemu and wine happy. */
subl $8, %esp # reserve space for switch16 pointer
- cli
+ CLI
movl %esp, %eax
/* Set up the 16bit stack frame with switch32 pointer on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET16
.section __ex_table,"...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/2] Transparent entry.S IRQ holdoff handling
...$4, %esp
-1: iret
+1: IRET
.section .fixup,"ax"
iret_exc:
- sti
+ STI
pushl $0 # no error code
pushl $do_iret_error
jmp error_code
@@ -299,14 +298,14 @@ ldt_ss:
* CPUs, which we can try to work around to make
* dosemu and wine happy. */
subl $8, %esp # reserve space for switch16 pointer
- cli
+ CLI
movl %esp, %eax
/* Set up the 16bit stack frame with switch32 pointer on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET16
.section __ex_table,"...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 8/24] i386 Vmi syscall assembly
...$0 # no error code
pushl $do_iret_error
jmp error_code
-.previous
+.popsection
.section __ex_table,"a"
.align 4
.long 1b,iret_exc
@@ -281,14 +281,14 @@ ldt_ss:
* CPUs, which we can try to work around to make
* dosemu and wine happy. */
subl $8, %esp # reserve space for switch16 pointer
- cli
+ CLI
movl %esp, %eax
/* Set up the 16bit stack frame with switch32 pointer on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET
.section __ex_table,"a...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 8/24] i386 Vmi syscall assembly
...$0 # no error code
pushl $do_iret_error
jmp error_code
-.previous
+.popsection
.section __ex_table,"a"
.align 4
.long 1b,iret_exc
@@ -281,14 +281,14 @@ ldt_ss:
* CPUs, which we can try to work around to make
* dosemu and wine happy. */
subl $8, %esp # reserve space for switch16 pointer
- cli
+ CLI
movl %esp, %eax
/* Set up the 16bit stack frame with switch32 pointer on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET
.section __ex_table,"a...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
...386/kernel/traps.c 2006-04-21 12:05:02.000000000 +1000
+++ tmp/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-05-02 15:57:41.000000000 +1000
@@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ fastcall void setup_x86_bogus_stack(unsi
memcpy((void *)(stack_bot + iret_frame16_off), ®s->eip, 20);
/* fill in the switch pointers */
switch16_ptr[0] = (regs->esp & 0xffff0000) | iret_frame16_off;
- switch16_ptr[1] = __ESPFIX_SS;
+ switch16_ptr[1] = __ESPFIX_SS | get_kernel_rpl();
switch32_ptr[0] = (unsigned long)stk + sizeof(struct pt_regs) +
8 - CPU_16BIT_STACK_SIZE;
- switch32_ptr[1] = __KERNEL_DS;
+ switch32_ptr[1] = __KER...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
...386/kernel/traps.c 2006-04-21 12:05:02.000000000 +1000
+++ tmp/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-05-02 15:57:41.000000000 +1000
@@ -1013,10 +1013,10 @@ fastcall void setup_x86_bogus_stack(unsi
memcpy((void *)(stack_bot + iret_frame16_off), ®s->eip, 20);
/* fill in the switch pointers */
switch16_ptr[0] = (regs->esp & 0xffff0000) | iret_frame16_off;
- switch16_ptr[1] = __ESPFIX_SS;
+ switch16_ptr[1] = __ESPFIX_SS | get_kernel_rpl();
switch32_ptr[0] = (unsigned long)stk + sizeof(struct pt_regs) +
8 - CPU_16BIT_STACK_SIZE;
- switch32_ptr[1] = __KERNEL_DS;
+ switch32_ptr[1] = __KER...
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 1/2] paravirt.h header
OK, this is the revised paravirt.h (Andi has seen this before), then the
second is the binary patching stuff. More things get added to the
paravirt struct in future patches, but this basic stuff hasn't changed
for some time.
====
This patch does the dumbest possible replacement of paravirtualized
instructions: calls through a "paravirt_ops" structure. Currently
these are function
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides
the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware,
paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system
to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor.
Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor
are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides
the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware,
paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system
to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor.
Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor
are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2007 Apr 18
33
[RFC PATCH 00/33] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides
the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware,
paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system
to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor.
Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor
are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths