search for: swiftcore

I have a rails application that runs on multiple mongrels and I would like to make the log files non-interlacing. Are there any logging modifications/other loggers out there that I could use to create process safe logging? Thank you, Matt Margolis

I heard about a new mongrel plugin or version that''s single threaded and uses non-blocking IO with events. It''s called something like "swifty fly". Anyone have a link for it? Thanks.

Just a quick announcement that an update to swiftiplied_mongrel and evented_mongrel which fixes the incompatibility with Mongrels > 1.0.1 has been released. http://swiftiply.swiftcore.org Let me know if you have any problems. Kirk Haines

Hey Everybody! I was wondering if/how Camping can process more than one request at once (i.e. not what Rails does). I''m fairly new to threads, and I bought a book, and read some of it, and dived into the Camping source... I found some thread stuff but I''m not... entirely sure. So I thought I would ask! RYan. http://yeahnah.org/

Hi, I have read many articles on the net today about configuring Ruby on Rails on a Windows server. But there doesn''t seem to a one solution for all on how to configure a new Ruby on Rails server. So I can use some advise with this. I am using a Windows 2003 server and don''t get many request a day. But most of the request are quite heavy. The main focus is on optimizing the

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have a periodically_call_remote call in a partial running at 0.20 times a second. <%= periodically_call_remote(:update => ''ack_distance_output'', :frequency => 0.2, :url=>{:action => :ackAdjustDistance}) %> the action looks like this def ackAdjustDistance @calMessage = Calibration.getMessage

Hello, I''m running a Rails application which must sort and manipulate a lot of data which are loaded in memory. The Rails app runs on 2 mongrel processes. When I first load the app, both are 32Mb in memory. After some days, both are between 200Mb and 300Mb. My question is : is there some kind of garbage collector in Mongrel? I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint

Hello, I''m running mongrel behind apache via proxypass. Every now and then, a spammer tries to proxy traffic through apache, and for some reason, apache forwards the request to mongrel, even though it''s not a site being hosted by me. At times this seems to cause mongrel to become unresponsive, and all requests to the site then fail with a proxy error until mongrel is

Hello Mongrels, Building on the last messages about Fastthread, can we get a detailed survey of the different ways people are deploying their applications? It will help with near-future Mongrel development. Please include the following things: * Framework, if any (Camping, Merb, Rails, Nitro, Ramaze, IOWA, Rack...) * Mongrel version * Mongrel handlers used (rails, dirhandler, camping,