Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "sweetmorn".
2009 Oct 31
1
!<command> from Manager
Hi,
Is it possible to run a !<command> from Manager connection?
Thanks in advance!
CB
2009 Mar 03
2
macro-stdexten question
I am running asterisk 1.4 and the Digium GUI SVN-branch-2.0-r4489.
When one phone calls another, I see the following on the console
(here, 6223 dials 6123)
-- Executing [6123 at DLPN_DefaultDialPlan:1] Macro("IAX2/6223-10489",
"stdexten|6123|SIP/6123&IAX2/6123") in new stack
-- Executing [s at macro-stdexten:1] Set("IAX2/6223-10489",
2008 Aug 04
2
How many gusets can I run with Centos 5.2
Hi,
how many gusets can I run with Centos 5.2? RH EL 5 is limeted to 4
guests while the advanced server is unlimeted.
We like to migrate a couple of small physical servers and some
test/development-systems to virtual systems.
Thanks for any hints.
Best regards
G?tz Reinicke
--
G?tz Reinicke
IT-Koordinator
Tel. +49 7141 969 420
Fax +49 7141 969 55 420
E-Mail goetz.reinicke at
2008 Jan 16
1
Urgent : About R and 4D
Hello,
Is it possible to interface R with 4D?
Thank you very much for a fast answer.
D. LEFLOCH
eMail : ah@2set2.fr
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Apr 23
1
Convert file in GSM codec to G729 codec
Hi,
I've tried the link
http://www.asteriskguru.com/tools/audio_conversion.php but it returns an error at the moment.
Any other ideas most welcome.
Tx Shaun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090423/c491a7b9/attachment.htm
2012 Sep 08
0
Windows 2008 Server, GPLPV drivers, Qemu upstream and BSoD
...t with Qemu upstream
(1.1-stable) there is a BSOD when using the most recent signed GPLPV
drivers (paging fault in non-paged area).
--
Stay in touch,
Mark van Dijk. ,---------------------------------
-----------------------------'' Sat Sep 08 08:14 UTC 2012
Today is Sweetmorn, the 32nd day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3178
2010 Feb 25
2
proto and baseenv()
I understand why the following happens ($.proto delegates to get,
which ascends the parent hierarchy up to globalenv()), but I still
find it anti-intuitive:
> z <- 1
> y <- proto(a=2)
> y$z
[1] 1
Although this is well-documented behavior; wouldn't it uphold the
principle of least surprise to inherit instead from baseenv() or
emptyenv()? (See attached patch.)
Spurious