search for: sweetmorn

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "sweetmorn".

2009 Oct 31
1
!<command> from Manager
Hi, Is it possible to run a !<command> from Manager connection? Thanks in advance! CB
2009 Mar 03
2
macro-stdexten question
I am running asterisk 1.4 and the Digium GUI SVN-branch-2.0-r4489. When one phone calls another, I see the following on the console (here, 6223 dials 6123) -- Executing [6123 at DLPN_DefaultDialPlan:1] Macro("IAX2/6223-10489", "stdexten|6123|SIP/6123&IAX2/6123") in new stack -- Executing [s at macro-stdexten:1] Set("IAX2/6223-10489",
2008 Aug 04
2
How many gusets can I run with Centos 5.2
Hi, how many gusets can I run with Centos 5.2? RH EL 5 is limeted to 4 guests while the advanced server is unlimeted. We like to migrate a couple of small physical servers and some test/development-systems to virtual systems. Thanks for any hints. Best regards G?tz Reinicke -- G?tz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reinicke at
2008 Jan 16
1
Urgent : About R and 4D
Hello, Is it possible to interface R with 4D? Thank you very much for a fast answer. D. LEFLOCH eMail : ah@2set2.fr [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Apr 23
1
Convert file in GSM codec to G729 codec
Hi, I've tried the link http://www.asteriskguru.com/tools/audio_conversion.php but it returns an error at the moment. Any other ideas most welcome. Tx Shaun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090423/c491a7b9/attachment.htm
2012 Sep 08
0
Windows 2008 Server, GPLPV drivers, Qemu upstream and BSoD
...t with Qemu upstream (1.1-stable) there is a BSOD when using the most recent signed GPLPV drivers (paging fault in non-paged area). -- Stay in touch, Mark van Dijk. ,--------------------------------- -----------------------------'' Sat Sep 08 08:14 UTC 2012 Today is Sweetmorn, the 32nd day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3178
2010 Feb 25
2
proto and baseenv()
I understand why the following happens ($.proto delegates to get, which ascends the parent hierarchy up to globalenv()), but I still find it anti-intuitive: > z <- 1 > y <- proto(a=2) > y$z [1] 1 Although this is well-documented behavior; wouldn't it uphold the principle of least surprise to inherit instead from baseenv() or emptyenv()? (See attached patch.) Spurious