search for: swartzendruber

> Correct. Like most UDP-based inetd services, tftpd is intended to be run in 'wait' mode. When the first request arrives, inetd starts the service but does not read the incoming packet (it can't, because it has no way to pass it along to the server). After that, inetd ignores that socket until the server exits. This isn't critical for tftp, but it does help to keep down the

Hi there. How can I configure dovecot not to listen for imaps connections on port 143. Thanks Lars

Morning all... I have a Dedicated server in a data center in Germany, and it has 2 3TB drives, but only software RAID. I have got them to install VMWare ESXi and so far everything is going ok... I have the 2 drives as standard data stores... But i am paranoid... So, i installed Nexenta as a VM, gave it a small disk to boot off and 2 1Tb disks on separate physical drives... I have created a

I have a project I'm investigating. The goal is to basically add lossless extensions to Opus. You have an Opus stream with standard packets, but interwoven in there are extension packets that contain the residuals. Ideally, compliant decoders play the stream back and ignore the extension packets. This (hopefully) makes the "lossless" stream compatible with existing players.

Vorbis Community, Seeing as how DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD decoders are becoming more accessible, I believe now may be a good time to standardize channel mappings for 6.1 and 7.1 audio. MPlayer currently implements 7.1 audio for Vorbis like so: FL FR RL RR FC LFE SL SR. Thank you, William Swartzendruber -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20090630/2a5efaf7/attachment.htm

Hello All, I have a zpool that consists of 2 raidz vdevs (raidz1-0 and raidz1-1). The first vdev is 4 1.5TB drives. The second was 4 500GB drives. I replaced the 4 500GB drives with 4 3TB drives. I replaced one at time, and resilvered each. Now the process is complete, I expected to have an extra 10TB (4*2.5TB) of raw space, but it''s still the same amount of space. I did an export and

On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 11:25 -0500, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > Hopefully I'm not out to lunch here. I ported tftp-hpa to our proprietary > OS, VOS (at stratus.com). We've always runs the old legacy tftpd from > inetd, so I wanted to continue doing so with tftp-hpa. It seems to work > okay, but I noticed that the code in tftpd.c...

On 01/30/2014 11:09 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > > Yeah, I get this part. I think I misunderstood what xinetd was doing - I > thought it was waiting for tftpd parent to exit and not processing > anything else. So xinetd is ignoring tftp port during this sequence, and > any new requests come in and are serviced by the pa...

...n-lossless. 4) It would result in something very complex for little gain over (e.g.) simply packing an alternate FLAC stream next to the Opus stream in the Ogg file. 5) Even if it was a good idea, such kind of extension would need to go through the IETF. Jean-Marc On 12/13/2013 12:34 AM, William Swartzendruber wrote: > I have a project I'm investigating. The goal is to basically add > lossless extensions to Opus. You have an Opus stream with standard > packets, but interwoven in there are extension packets that contain the > residuals. Ideally, compliant decoders play the stream back a...

First off, I have to say I really like the antispam plugin. I am running a (relatively) new freebsd 8.0 server with postfix/dovecot/dspam/squirrelmail and it works great. Create a SPAM folder and tell the dovecot antispam plugin to use INBOX.SPAM as the spam folder and drag messages from INBOX to the spam folder and they are trained as spam. Here is the problem though: after training

Hopefully I'm not out to lunch here. I ported tftp-hpa to our proprietary OS, VOS (at stratus.com). We've always runs the old legacy tftpd from inetd, so I wanted to continue doing so with tftp-hpa. It seems to work okay, but I noticed that the code in tftpd.c has a 'while (1)' loop that has this at the end: /* * Now that we have read the request packet from

Hello, I'm confused as to whether opus_multistream_encode creates a frame or a packet. The function summary says this: Encodes a multistream Opus *frame*. But later on it says: The length of the encoded *packet* (in bytes) on success or a negative > error code (see Error codes<http://www.opus-codec.org/docs/html_api-1.0.2/group__opus__errorcodes.html>) > on failure. I would

Are multistream packets limited to one frame per stream in a given packet? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20140326/acfa13ab/attachment.htm

I must apologize for my previous question. It seems that Opus Multistream uses self-delimiting packets for the purpose of concatenating multiple Opus packets into a single larger one at the transport layer. I was mistakenly under the impression that Multistream used multiple frames inside an Opus packet and was very confused about how to achieve 255 channels like that. -------------- next part

Running dovecot 1.2.12 on ubuntu 10.10. Here is the problem: I have mysql backend for expire. I am using the dovecot-postfix package which creates /etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-mail-stack-delivery.conf which looks like this: # Some general options protocols = imap imaps managesieve disable_plaintext_auth = no ssl = yes ssl_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-mail.pem ssl_key_file =