search for: sv3

...--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2011/06/03 19:25:00, 2] lib/smbldap_util.c:smbldap_search_domain_info(277) smbldap_search_domain_info: Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=SV3))] [2011/06/03 19:25:00, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open_connection(796) smbldap_open_connection: connection opened [2011/06/03 19:25:00, 1] lib/smbldap_util.c:add_new_domain_info(233) add_new_domain_info: failed to add domain dn= sambaDomainName=SV3,dc=domain,dc=com with: Invalid DN syntax...

...sing the package 'dlm'. This model has two observation equations and three state equations. Each observation equation represents structural shocks based on SVAR for country i, where i=1 to 2. The structural shocks (S1 and S2) are to be decomposed into common (sv1) and country-specific (sv2, sv3) shocks. We are interested only in the coefficient of common shock. Moreover, the transition equation is represented as a random noise. Observation equation: S1=c(1)*sv1+sv2 S2=c(2)*sv1+sv3 Transition equation: sv1=(variance=1) sv2=(c(3)) sv3=(c(4)) The variance (of the region-specific shock)...

Dear R-Developers, The traffic today on s-news where Terry Therneau, I, and others are reporting some of the problems we have had using or converting applications to SV4 reminded me of something Duncan Temple Lang had mentioned to me a year ago that I wanted to follow up on. I recall that Duncan said either that if SV4 were to be implemented in R that it would not be the default behavior, or

Does R, or will R, be integrating the changes to the Chambers/Lucent S language under their version 5.0? If not already, then when? John Thaden Little Rock, Arkansas, USA -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"

I found that predict.gnls failed with a wierd error message about a non-numeric argument to a binary vector in one of three nearly identical uses. Error in Inh/Ki : non-numeric argument to binary operator (Inh and Ki are arguments to the function used in the formula for the object whose predictions were requested). It turns out that the problem is in getCovariateFormula(). The final line in

Dear Martin, Since no one else has picked up on this, I?ll take a crack at it: The proposal is to define the S3 class of model-frame objects as c(?model.frame?, ?data.frame?) (not the formal class of these objects, even though this feature was coincidentally introduced in S4). That?s unlikely to do harm, since model frames would still ?inherit? data.frame methods. It's possible that some

I don't have a copy of SV4 (or SV3, where model.frame was introduced), but S+ 8.3 (based on SV4) puts the class "model.frame" on model.frame()'s return value but has no methods (in the default packages) for class "model.frame". Perhaps that is why R omitted the class. However, S+ 8.3's (and problably S&...

(-2) %% 12 seems to give the wrong result in R pre 63.3: > e1 <- -2 > e2 <- 12 > e1 %% e2 [1] -2 > e1 - floor(e1/e2) * e2 [1] 10 In Splus: > e1 <- -2 > e2 <- 12 > e1 %% e2 [1] 10 > e1 - floor(e1/e2) * e2 [1] 10 Paul Gilbert -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read