Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sust".
Did you mean:
must
2007 Mar 07
3
1.0.rc26 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz.sig
Most importantly this should fix mbox problems in recent RCs.
* Changed --with-headers to --enable-header-install
* If time moves backwards only max. 5 seconds, sleep until we're back
in the original present instead of killing ourself. An error is
still logged.
- IMAP: With
2007 Mar 07
3
1.0.rc26 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz.sig
Most importantly this should fix mbox problems in recent RCs.
* Changed --with-headers to --enable-header-install
* If time moves backwards only max. 5 seconds, sleep until we're back
in the original present instead of killing ourself. An error is
still logged.
- IMAP: With
2009 Apr 02
2
all subsets for glm
...ps() but that works with glm.
Any feedback highly appreciated.
--
Harald von Waldow <hvwaldow at chem.ethz.ch>
Safety and Environmental Technology Group
Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Fon: +41 44 632 7142
Fax: +41 44 632 1189
Web: www.sust-chem.ethz.ch
2013 Oct 21
3
speeding up "sum of squared differences" calculation
All,
I am using a sum of squared differences in the objective function of an optimization problem I am doing and I have managed to speed it up using the outer function versus the nested for loops, but my suspicion is that the calculation could be done even quicker. Please see the code below for a simple example. If anyone can point out a faster way I would appreciate it greatly.
Thanks,
Roger