search for: surroundings

On Fri Sep 21 16:31:21 2012, Stephen F. Booth wrote: > 6.1: L R C LFE Ls Rs Cs (MPEG 6.1 A layout) I'm confused. WAV puts the rear centre before everything but 'Front left of center' and 'Front right of center'. Are you saying you prefer the extra front channels to to side/rear surround, or that you prefer the MPEG order to the WAVE order? -r

Hello everyone! Please bear with me, I am a complete audio-newbie, and I apologise if I am asking a question that I should know. As most of you all know, DVD's have 5.1 audio, and I want to preserve that in my voribs files. So, to ask the question : Does it support Surround sound? Thank you very much!

Hi there, I've been searching for a while now, for an answer, whether or not EAX and surround sound is supported in wine. And all I've found are contradictory opinions. So, still I can't get neither to work, and I hope, this is the right place to ask for help. [Wink] As I understood it, wine should be able to play surround sound, when alsa is able to do it. "speaker-test"

I apologize for the terribly long message, but here goes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- First, regarding existing tools that I now about. libavcodec and users (e.g. HandBrake): - if there are 6 channels or less, the layout is set by the decoder as per the FLAC specification - if there are more than 6 channels, the layout is

I am having an annoying problem displaying the labels of a select box correctly where there is an ampersand contained within the label string. On a form being rendered with the form_for helper the collection_select reads data from a Mysql 5.075 database the text stored in the database is "Surabaya & Surrounding Areas" when rendered and displayed in firefox 3.6 or safari is is

Hey folks, As I understand it, the vorbis codec had support for a channel count > 2, but that it didn't explicitly state the channel binding for channels 3, 4, ... . I'm assuming that with enough fiddling, it would theoretically be possible to use a 5.1 stream encoded into vorbis. From what I know of the CELT codec, it handles either only mono or stereo. Is that correct? -- Kip

Hi, what's the best way of creating a multichannel ogg vorbis from a DVD with 5.1 surround sound ? Is it possible yet ? -- Trick --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject

This came out of the OggPCM discussion, but I think it needs to be addressed on a wider scale. Let's start here, 5 years ago.. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2000-July/009513.html (I included this email, below) I emailed David (author of that email) and asked him to join this list. I'm thinking, as I look at the problem, that surround sound needs to be defined _outside_

Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:51:12 +0100 (BST) From: DG Malham <dgm2@york.ac.uk> To: vorbis-dev@xiph.org Cc: DG Malham <dgm2@york.ac.uk>, Rob Fletcher <rpf1@york.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] True surround sound for Ogg -- a proposal (fwd) In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.95L.1000710092216.9043693B-100000@turpin.york.ac.uk> Message-ID:

text() can draw text on a plot. Do we have a way/function to draw text with a box surround it? Thanks, -james

Now that we've selected a channel mapping for 7 and 8 channel flac, the command-line encoder tools needs updating to accept wav files with compatible channel maps. -r -------------- next part --------------

Hi everyone, Over the last two weeks or so, I've been thinking about how to add surround sound to Ogg -- and more than that, to do it in the best way possible. With this in mind, I started considering using Ambisonic surround sound. The advantages of this format are considerable: a) It was developed in the early to mid '70s, so the patents should be expired by now.

Hi, are there any plans for FLAC to implement spatial audio? Or maybe Atmos on FLAC? renatas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20170810/57a79181/attachment.html>

On 13-03-01 2:17 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Ralph, looks like there's a missing closing brace there. Do you want to fix > it and resubmit or should I fix it? Sorry about that. Is this one better? -r -------------- next part -------------- commit 93d92eb5e98cacd8cab185a0bfdaafb795b14b22 Author: Ralph Giles <giles at mozilla.com> Date: Thu Jan 17 16:21:45 2013 -0800

Hello, I'm new to this list, and I would like to know about the current status of FLAC and surround formats (5.1, 7.1). I know it is possible to compress interleaved multichannel files with FLAC, but does it in any way have any multichannel matrix, that collects common information from all channels and use this when compressing? If not, wouldn't it be a great idea to have this feature!!!

Hi, I want to draw a boxplot and I want to get rid of the surrounding box. So that there are only the axis lines left on the bottom and on the left. I tried a litte bit with box() but I dont get it the way I want. Can somebody help me out?

Hi, When using the Alsa output device, is it possible to configure it to use a surround sound output, like "surround51" or "surround40"? I found a few references on the internet, but nothing clear. They talked about the deprecated wine.cfg, or registry keys I don't have. The winecfg utility also doesn't allow changing any useful audio setting in this regard.

On Jan 17, 2013, at 21:41, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 13-01-17 7:26 PM, Brian Willoughby wrote: >> I vote for documenting the --channel-map option in the --help > > Do you ever use --channel-map yourself, or recommend it to clients? Professional surround mastering is delivered on very specific media, and FLAC is not an option (to my knowledge). I use FLAC for archival of original

Michael Grave just posted a question about surround conferences. http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=564633430#/note.php?note_id=5009726 3908&id=564633430&index=0 I didn't see it posted on the ast-list, what do you think? Does something like this have potential? I'd love to listen in on one of these calls to see how it actually sounds if someone builds a trial

I vote for documenting the --channel-map option in the --help I don't like the idea of rejecting a multichannel file merely for mapping, so there should be a documented option plus an error message pointing to the option. This should compare to the WAVE and AIFF errors where the utility suggests to the user how to get the file converted safely. Brian Willoughby Sound Consulting On