Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "surrogate_valu".
Did you mean:
surrogate_value
2017 Jul 31
0
[PATCH v11 03/10] daemon: utils: New functions unix_canonical_path, utf16le_to_utf8 and tests.
...Buffer.add_char outbuf (Char.chr ((c land 0x3f) lor 0x80))
+ )
+ in
+ loop (len-1) c
+ in
+
+ (* Loop over the input UTF16-LE characters. *)
+ let is_high_surrogate c = c >= 0xd800 && c < 0xdc00
+ and is_low_surrogate c = c >= 0xdc00 && c < 0xe000
+ and surrogate_value highc lowc =
+ 0x1_0000 + (highc - 0xd800) * 0x400 + lowc - 0xdc00
+ in
+
+ let len = String.length instr in
+ let rec loop i =
+ if i+1 >= len then ()
+ else (
+ let c = Char.code instr.[i] + (Char.code instr.[i+1] lsl 8) in
+
+ let wc, skip =
+ (* High surrogate -...
2017 Jul 21
10
[PATCH v10 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v9 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html
This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor
patches):
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html
There is no substantive change. I
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series
"[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml."
(https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html)
v8 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html
v9:
- I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of
smaller, incremental patches.
There are some other changes vs v8, but
2017 Jul 31
16
[PATCH v11 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html
No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series
now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else
needed is upstream.
Rich.
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html
and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm
intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new
virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html
Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux
and Windows guests.
Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html
I believe this addresses all comments received so far.
Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images
processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is
identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid