search for: surpriz

Dear R Gurus: I read somewhere that functions are considered vectors. Is this true, please? thanks Edna Bell

...nit *ScheduleDAGSDNodes::NewSUnit(SDNode *N) { [...] if (N->isMachineOpcode() && [...] So basically, it means that calling CreateNewSUnit with NULL will call NewSUnit with NULL and with result in NULL->isMachineOpcode() which would certainly trigger a segfault. Now I'm highly surprized because I still haven't encountered any segfault in the scheduler yet all schedulers might call this code. So either I'm missing something and this code is valid or this code has not been executed for a *really* long time now and should be removed or fixed. Unfortunately, I don't know...

Hi all i have two data sets, spot and futures cash market prices. to estimate the minimum variance hedge ratio, i first had a glance on the correlation coefficient of relative price change (ln(St / St-1). surprizingly the value is just 0.2 compared to actual price correlation of 0.9. (i did regress the spot change on future change, co-effi is 0.3, and R2 is only 0.025 a) in such scenario can someone help me in estimating the ratio which are time varying. b) is there a way to define the function as the corr...

...was to be able to do this without making it globally visible: foo <- function(x, args=foo2Args()) { foo2Args <- function(a=1, b=2){list(a,b)} # above would actual do more testing of args #now I would call foo2 with args, but to test just args } Now, > foo(1) # should I be surprized that this works [[1]] [1] 1 [[2]] [1] 2 > foo(1, args=foo2Args(a=2, b=10)) # or that this does not Error in foo(1, args = foo2Args(a = 2, b = 10)) : could not find function "foo2Args" Paul ==================================================================================== L...

the man page for relational operators (see, e.g., ?'<') says: " Binary operators which allow the comparison of values in atomic vectors. Arguments: x, y: atomic vectors, symbols, calls, or other objects for which methods have been written. " it is somewhat surprizing that the following works: '<'(1) # logical(0) '<'() # logical(0) '<'(1,2,3) # TRUE what does 'binary' mean here, precisely? in the first two examples, one might suspect that '<' treats the missing arguments as missi...

the man page for relational operators (see, e.g., ?'<') says: " Binary operators which allow the comparison of values in atomic vectors. Arguments: x, y: atomic vectors, symbols, calls, or other objects for which methods have been written. " it is somewhat surprizing that the following works: '<'(1) # logical(0) '<'() # logical(0) '<'(1,2,3) # TRUE what does 'binary' mean here, precisely? in the first two examples, one might suspect that '<' treats the missing arguments as missi...

...ecover is to reset the machine account from the Windows DC side and do a "net join" to the domain from the Linux side. The Linux machine is able to keep its "trust" with the domain exactly 7 days, which, AFAIU, is the default in Samba and also in the DC side. It is somewhat surprizing since this Linux Samba server w/o problems for months. >From the Windows DC side, the only thing which was done just before this problem appeared, was to patch the DC to SP1 as far as I remember. Below are the messages we can see in the /var/log/samba/samba.log file: [2006/01/18 10:49...

...e now need to allocate memory in the middle of processing a packet. I think discarding a completely valid and well-formed packet from the receive queue because we are unable to allocate new memory with GFP_ATOMIC for future packets is not a good idea. It certainly violates the principle of least surprize: when one sees host pass packet to guest, one expects the packet to get into the networking stack, not get dropped by the driver internally. Guest stack can do with the packet what it sees fit. We actually wake up a thread if we can't fill up the queue, that will fill it up in GFP_KERNEL cont...

...e now need to allocate memory in the middle of processing a packet. I think discarding a completely valid and well-formed packet from the receive queue because we are unable to allocate new memory with GFP_ATOMIC for future packets is not a good idea. It certainly violates the principle of least surprize: when one sees host pass packet to guest, one expects the packet to get into the networking stack, not get dropped by the driver internally. Guest stack can do with the packet what it sees fit. We actually wake up a thread if we can't fill up the queue, that will fill it up in GFP_KERNEL cont...

...01" and "13/1/2001" were considered by R >> to b >> e in a standard unambiguous format (or otherwise an error be reported?) >> and yet they >> >> >> are parsed incorrectly according to what one could think is obvious. It >> is a >> lso surprizing that not only "13/1/2001" but also "1/2/2001" and >> "2/1/2001" are successful but incorrect parsed as if they are unambiguous, >> and yet >> "13/1/2001" is ambiguous, though there is really just one way to parse it >> meaningfully....

Roger, Following your guide, it now works great, shutting down the UPS after the system has shutdown. I went with the bash script method. I have noticed, however, that the command to the UPS to do the delayed shutdown comes RIGHT as openSUSE is shutting down. While that is a good thing as far as timing and the potential race is concerned, I have seen it once where the UPS received the command

...5.56 tstnum6 0.97500 0.08461 11.52 The mean of (the columns of) the data matrix is 3.229167 3.695833 3.729167 4.066667 3.700000 4.204167 which is in exact agreement with the lmer() results when converted to the same parameterization (mu_i = mu + alpha_i, with alpha_1 = 0). (Notice the surprizing, depressing, and so far unexplained *drop* in the response over the second summer.) What I *don't* understand is the correlation structure of the estimates produced by lmer(), which is: Correlation of Fixed Effects: (Intr) tstnm2 tstnm3 tstnm4 tstnm5 tstnum2 -0.434 tstnum3 -0.434...

...g scripts which I wrote to manipulate those emails. Each time I want to revert changes in one set of maildirs I've rsync'ing them from backup copy: $ rsync -rcv --delete backup/ mail/ Nothing special about that. However my scripts are modyfing only mail/INBOX maildir, nothing else. To my surprize when I ran rsync command to revert my changes here is what I got (I will use -n in below examples for now): $ rsync -v -n -rc --delete backup/ mail/ sending incremental file list deleting INBOX/new/1247266872_0.9989.myhost,U=759,FMD5=7e33429f656f1e6e9d79b29c3f82c57e deleting INBOX/new/1247249243_...

Time Series functions in R ========================== I think a good basic S-like functionality for library(ts) in base R would include ts class, tsp, is.ts, as.ts plot methods start end window frequency cycle deltat lag diff aggregate filter spectrum, spec.pgram, spec.taper, cumulative periodogram, spec.ar? ar -- at least univariate by Yule-Walker arima -- sim, filter, mle, diag, forecast

...hentication for user [COMPANY]\[domainuser] returned NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD The user freerad is added to the winbindd_priv group, and I've also tried setting ntlm auth = mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only, and right now it is set to ntlm auth = yes Any suggestions to how I can solve it? I am quite surprized that the error I get in the end is NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. Thank you in advance, and let me know if I should include any other information! Oleg

...st as win98 on a P-60) I have run it from wine, and it's slow (about a 468-33) The real machine i runt it from is a celeron 416, 160 MB ram, geforce 2 mx400 PCI I *finaly* discovered i could get a trace from it by using winedbg -debugmsg i.e. ONE dash. I run a diff on both files, and i was surprized to see so many differences. The sections about DGA remained the same: trace:x11drv:X11DRV_XF86DGA2_Init warn:x11drv:X11DRV_XF86DGA2_Init disabling XF86DGA2 (insufficient permissions?) How come starcraft runs fast without the use of DGA? Has anybody else had seen this effect before? How do i...

...own comes RIGHT as openSUSE is shutting down. While that is a good > thing as far as timing and the potential race is concerned, I have seen > it once where the UPS received the command to do the delayed shutdown, > but *not* the command to do the delayed restart. Hello Robert, This is surprizing. To the best of my knowledge the delayed-shutdown and the delayed-restart commands to the UPS are one single command. What is the symptom that the UPS has not received "delayed-restart"? Is it that the UPS does not restart? This could be due to something else. Best Regards, Roge...

OK, I have done all the stuff at my end and at Bellsters end to add 21 new area codes (all of california) to the Bellster dial plan. Pretty cool deal! I hope others go for this quickly - as it could be a really nice co-op. I do suggest to Jeff - do some sort of calling trunk -vs- routed trunk match to make sure that someone can't run their credits sky-high by making calls through

...\x41' to be sent to a UPS, that this equals sending the 'A' character? In other words, is it considered portable that (at least for the output of the serial functions) we use an ASCII character map? Otherwise, on (for example) an EBCDIC system (do these still exist?) you're in for a surprize, since sending an 'A' will transmit '\0xC1'. Or do the serial function handle this? Regards, Arjen -- Eindhoven - The Netherlands Key fingerprint - 66 4E 03 2C 9D B5 CB 9B 7A FE 7E C1 EE 88 BC 57

I am always deleting the wine dir, and i'd like to keep a few applications elsewhere. One of these apps (interstate '76) needs compatibility mode window 98. Anyway, if a solution also works on windows, wonderful (though the solutions i've seen required installation of something, and that's no good for me since i want the game portable), but if it only works one wine, that is ok.