search for: surkamp

I found this from ocfs1.4 document: g) NFS OCFS2 volumes can be exported as NFS volumes. This support is limited to NFS version 3, which translates to Linux kernel version 2.4 or later. Users must mount the NFS volumes on the clients using the nordirplus mount option. This disables the READDIRPLUS RPC call to workaround a bug in NFSD, detailed in the following link:

...us = -2 (6965,2):ocfs2_remove_inode:614 ERROR: status = -2 (6965,2):ocfs2_wipe_inode:740 ERROR: status = -2 (6965,2):ocfs2_delete_inode:974 ERROR: status = -2 I think this messages are related to the nfsd restart. Any clue? Regards, -- .:''''':. .:' ` S?rgio Surkamp | Gerente de Rede :: ........ sergio at gruposinternet.com.br `:. .:' `:, ,.:' *Grupos Internet S.A.* `: :' R. Lauro Linhares, 2123 Torre B - Sala 201 : : Trindade - Florian?polis - SC :.' :: +55 48 3234-4109 :...

...and whether it supports disabling READDIRPLUS or not. While the actual problem will eventually likely be addressed in NFS, we are trying to decide whether we should workaround the issue internally in OCFS2. The above information will help us decide the same. Lastly, we would like to thank S?rgio Surkamp for helping us to resolve this issue. Thank you OCFS2 Team

...and whether it supports disabling READDIRPLUS or not. While the actual problem will eventually likely be addressed in NFS, we are trying to decide whether we should workaround the issue internally in OCFS2. The above information will help us decide the same. Lastly, we would like to thank S?rgio Surkamp for helping us to resolve this issue. Thank you OCFS2 Team

...e on how to debug further or if it is the same problem as the ones on the cited bug reports? The node#0 has heavier I/O load than node#1, could it trigger something? The filesystem is about 94% full (751G of 803G). Thanks! Regards, -- .:''''':. .:' ` S?rgio Surkamp | Gerente de Rede :: ........ sergio at gruposinternet.com.br `:. .:' `:, ,.:' *Grupos Internet S.A.* `: :' R. Lauro Linhares, 2123 Torre B - Sala 201 : : Trindade - Florian?polis - SC :.' :: +55 48 3234-4109 :...

Hello Ladies and Gents .. First time poster .. I have been experiencing several issues with unexplained Fencing and silly mount/unmount errors With Version 1.4.7 on UEK (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3) running under kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 With ocfs2console-1.6.3-2.el5,ocfs2-tools-1.6.3-2.el5 & ocfs2-2.6.18-128.el5-1.4.7-1.el5 RPM Packages. You See, the problem is that I was

Hi ocfs2 developers, there are some news about the schedule for a new ocfs2 release that solve the actual bug/limitations? I can see an 1.4.7 release tagged here: http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=summary Is there a planned release date? in my environment (about 5000000 files with 300000 new files/deletion per day) I see load until 1000 and I/O almost blocked for some hours of the

We're trying to setup 3 PRDM partitions (VMware) across 2 nodes. As long as only one is configured in cluster.conf, there's not problem. As soon as we try to use 2 or more we get issues. It looks the same as bug 636: http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=636 I posted my cluster.conf and command line results there. I'm including them here in the hopes that someone on this

Hi , I am getting the error "No space left on device" on a device with free space which is ocfs2 filesystem. Additional information is as below, [root at sai93 staging]# debugfs.ocfs2 -n -R "stats" /dev/sdb1 | grep -i "Cluster Size" Block Size Bits: 12 Cluster Size Bits: 15 [root at sai93 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release

Hi guys! I can?t find an answer in google, so my last hope is this mailing list. Story. I have two servers with same arrays. Servers connected by DRBD. I used ocfs2 as file system, also I used NFS4 to access to the ocfs2 drive. I do not have any idea, but the allocated descriptors in /proc/sys/fs/file-nr increasing every time while drive accessed. So after some time allocated descriptions over

Hello, today I noticed the following on *only* one node: ----- cut here ----- Apr 29 11:01:18 node06 kernel: [2569440.616036] INFO: task ocfs2_wq:5214 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Apr 29 11:01:18 node06 kernel: [2569440.616056] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Apr 29 11:01:18 node06 kernel: [2569440.616080] ocfs2_wq D

Hello! When is it planned ocfs2 1.6 will be available for RHEL? /Kristian

Hello, First of all, i am new at the list and i have several questions about ocfs2 performance. Where i am working i am having huge performance problens with ocfs2. Let me tell my envoriment. 3 Xen VirtualMachines withs ocfs2 mounting an LUN exported over iSCSI. ( acctualy 3 LUNS, 3 ocfs2 clusters ) I am not the one who configured the envoriment, but it is making the performance of my MAIL