search for: supppose

Hi, It's my problem, supppose that we have a data.frame: t a b c 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 6 0 1 0 7 1 1 1 8 0 1 0 I need extract duplicat row i.e i nedd frame like this a b c 3 1 1 1 8 0 1 0 I try use subset(t, duplicated(t)) and t[duplicated(t), ] but this command return a b c 3 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 8 0 1 0...

...ink it could. :) I don't think I've ever seen exactly this layout. Does anyone know if there is anything in R that does a graph like this or that can be adapted to do it. Unfortunately my Spanish is non-existent so I am not sure how effective the graph is in achieving whatever it's suppposed to do. A dot chart might be as effective but it is a flashy graphic. Thanks

...e def aaaa end end #main program yadayada = function_name(parameter) I understand: - the main program goes in a controller I have to create - but where am I suppose to put the Class stuff? I''ll re-use the Class stuff for different controllers but I''m not sure where it is suppposed to go. Thanks. -T -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I just installed Softick Card Export 2.19 (http://www.softick.com/cardexport2/) on my Palm Tungsten E. It is supposed to let me access the SD card inside my Palm without the need of an external SD card reader. This software is suppposed to be compatible with Linux usb-storage since version 2.15... but I didn't find how to use it. If I do "lsmod | grep -i usb", I see the following: usb_storage 61193 0 scsi_mod 121293 2 sd_mod,usb_storage usbserial 25769 1 visor Anybody hav...

...g!") : > could not find function "nofunction" > Current call stack locations: > . . . . test.R#6 > > The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was > invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. > > I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 > location could be considered a bug. > > Duncan Murdoch > >

...tion("something stupid I am doing!") : could not find function "nofunction" Current call stack locations: . . . . test.R#6 The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 location could be considered a bug. Duncan Murdoch

...a 'trial' debian sarge wine0.9.8 installation that does not have this defect: There the font has the umlauts, looks pretty and does not destroy menu/dialog elements. Similarly, on 2 SuSE9.3/wine installations the problem is also not present. Somehow I will have to change the system font I supppose!?? In the user /.wine configuration directory there are several (reg-)files with relation also to fonts. But I could not make succesful font changes by editing any of these files. Moreover, I copied the 'good' .wine-configuration files from the above old trial debian HD to my 2 troubled...

...not find function "nofunction" >> Current call stack locations: >> . . . . test.R#6 >> >> The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was >> invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. >> >> I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 >> location could be considered a bug. >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> >> > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://...

...defect: > > There the font has the umlauts, looks pretty and does > > not destroy menu/dialog elements. > > > > Similarly, on 2 SuSE9.3/wine installations the problem > > is also not present. > > > > Somehow I will have to change the system font I > > supppose!?? > > > > > > In the user /.wine configuration directory there are > > several (reg-)files with relation also to fonts. But I > > could not make succesful font changes by editing any > > of these files. > > > > Moreover, I copied the 'good' ....

...tion" >>> Current call stack locations: >>> . . . . test.R#6 >>> >>> The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was >>> invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. >>> >>> I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 >>> location could be considered a bug. >>> >>> Duncan Murdoch >>> >>> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSC...

...ations: >>>>> . . . . test.R#6 >>>>> >>>>> The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was >>>>> invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. >>>>> >>>>> I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 >>>>> location could be considered a bug. >>>>> >>>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ &gt...

...Current call stack locations: >>>> . . . . test.R#6 >>>> >>>> The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was >>>> invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. >>>> >>>> I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 >>>> location could be considered a bug. >>>> >>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-help at r-projec...

Hello, We need to use iSCSI in some of our domUs. By the moment, iSCSI is not for system filesystem, but for data filesystem. I am wondering what is the best way to use it. Is it better to configure it in dom0 and then attach the device to the domU? Or is it better to configure it directly in the domU? I am thinking that if we configure it in the dom0, then we can''t share that iscsi

...quot; > >> Current call stack locations: > >> . . . . test.R#6 > >> > >> The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was > >> invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. > >> > >> I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 > >> location could be considered a bug. > >> > >> Duncan Murdoch > >> > >> > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To...

...gt;> . . . . test.R#6 >>>>>> >>>>>> The first report is from the explicit call in f() on line 2 that was >>>>>> invoked on line 4, and the second report happens during error handling. >>>>>> >>>>>> I supppose the fact that traceback() isn't showing you the line 6 >>>>>> location could be considered a bug. >>>>>> >>>>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ______________________...

I am afraid my errors are worse! (so are my postings. I should have given an example.) ``` x <- 1 y <- 2 nofunction("something stupid I am doing!") z <- 4 ``` and ``` > source("where-is-my-water.R") Error in nofunction("something stupid I am doing!") : could not find function "nofunction" ``` and no traceback is available.

Hello, We hope you are reading this message in a fine mood. I'd like to welcome you on a very interesting opportunity. We supppose you will be very interested in a home job in which you could get about AUD4000 per month. This job will not affect your present career, it will only take a small part of your free time. The only things you will need to have to start running your business with our company are reliable Internet/E-ma...

...aking last nights cvs snapshot and copying over the rlm_chap > folder overwriting the contents of the same folder in the > freeradius-1.0.5 release and recompiling. I see that it is trying to > pass the username as "host/IS--000031176". I thought the updated > rlm_mschap was suppposed to strip the "host/" part of the username. Do > I need to create a realm to strip the "host/"? > Any help would be appreciated!!! > Thanks, > jamie > > > make clean > > ./configure --configure --with-raddbdir=/etc/radius > --with-logdir=/var/log/r...

Hi, I have a server that has been running Centos for about a year but I have not checked to see if there have been any changes to update. Has there been any updates or fixes for the update? I have not been in the loop for a while now. Thanks! -- Dexter Desire is the ingredient that changes the hot water of mediocrity to the steam of outstanding success. It's the ingredient that enables a

Hi, I'm trying to synchronize some directories. Let's say I need to synchronize: /web/sites /var/qmail/control /home/ken I don't want to run 3 rsync commands. I have already tried using --include --exclude options, but it didn't work at all. I supppose my command should be as follows: rsync -azvl --include-from=includes --exclude='*' / username@host.com:/ken/backup/ includes: /web/sites /var/qmail/control /home/ken The result is that I get nothing. Nothing is copied then. No errors reported by rsync. I also tried the same command, bu...