search for: suppossing

To create a new CallInst I used to call the following constructor: CallInst(Value *F, const std::vector<Value*> &Par, const std::string &Name = "", Instruction *InsertBefore = 0); However, it seems as though that constructor has been removed. I assume that I'm suppossed to use the following constructor, but I can't figure out what to pass as the Args parameter

...tory of unit tests. Those mostly don't depend on llvm-gcc and > the few ones that do should be moved elsewhere anyway. How much value is on adding cross-platform support for the tests in llvm/test? I've looked at them and the task seems achievable with not too much work. Am I right suppossing that a non-zero return value for the "RUN:" command(s) means failure, and zero means success, and there is no more stuff than that to worry about for knowing the result? -- Oscar

On Oct 11, 2008, at 8:41 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote: >> If you were interested in working on this project, it seems that the >> place to start is not by adding new crazy sorts of API tests for >> LLVM. It would be a better use of your time to take what we already >> have and make it work (with one of your proposals) on windows. When >> the infrastructure is set up,

...ng cross-platform support for the tests in > llvm/test? I've looked at them and the task seems achievable with not > too much work. It would be a huge benefit. Those tests cover a significant portion of the sanity checks in the compiler as well as indirect api tests. > Am I right suppossing that a non-zero return value for the "RUN:" > command(s) means failure, and zero means success, and there is no more > stuff than that to worry about for knowing the result? Yep exactly. -Chris

...e about VS project files. I use GNU Make for building my software and the build system supports several compilers on various platforms, including gcc and cl. It is tricky, though. I don't know how much LLVM build system is tied to the GNU toolchain or how much it depends on *nix features, but suppossing that adding support for MSVC++ is impractical, perhaps it would be simpler to implement a Makefile-based build system for MSVC++ than to keep up to date the project files. This would support features like the one Anton mentions on the other response to you, thus lessening the maintenance work. A re...

John Myers <atomicdog.jwm at gmail.com> writes: > I'm looking for some pointers on how to troubleshoot this problem. I'm > trying to write a backend for the AVR. > There is an undefined reference at line 48 which is the line FrameInfo() is > on. I've tried to use the MSP430 and other targets as references so I'm not > sure > what changes I did would cause a

> Is it reasonable to ask Yes, it's reasonable. Moreover, I'd be content with a build system that doesn't use MSVS IDE at all. If the build system could be parameterized to use microsoft cl compiler (cygwin gcc is useless for my purposes), e.g. something like in Boost project, I'd be more than happy to never care about VS project files. Yet, I want to limit my involvement

Hello everyone, I have two problems which I am unable to solve : 1.I am trying to add the  row labels (g1-g2000) to the very left of a data table. The data table is 2000 rows  by 62 columns.I have used the following code. read.table(file="C:\\Documents and Settings\\Owner\\My Documents\\colon cancer1.txt",header=T,row.names=1) rowname(dat) <- paste("g", c(1:nrow(dat)),

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:44 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > To create a new CallInst I used to call the following constructor: > > CallInst(Value *F, const std::vector<Value*> &Par, const std::string > &Name = "", Instruction *InsertBefore = 0); > > However, it seems as though that constructor has been removed. I assume > that I'm suppossed to

...will generate makefiles if you wish. Just use this command: cmake -G "NMake Makefiles" but then you should use a different directory for the build. > However, while it does generate a bunch of the usual ll*.exe's, > clang.exe is still not there. Am I still missing something? Suppossing that you have the LLVM source code in c:/llvm, do you have c:/llvm/tools/clang/CMakeLists.txt ? If that is not present, most likely your clang setup is wrong. The LLVM cmake build test for the presence of the above file and, if found, automatically builds clang. If the test fails, clang is ignor...

Thanks for the help Reid! I frequently look at the online doxygen, but sometimes its difficult to determine the correct replacement when a method is removed from LLVM. In this particular case, I knew which new CallInst constructor to use, I just couldn't figure out the proper syntax. At any rate, I really appreciate your help!! Reid Spencer wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:44 -0600,

I am analyzing some data obtained after measuring some parameters at different times in samples obtained from many subjects. The model is quite simple: aov(parameter ~ Time + Error(Subject/Time)) Now I want to make a pairwise comparison between the levels of Time. However, I have not find how to do such a thing. I cannot use TukeyHSD or pairwise.t.test, I supposse. Maybe using contrasts? Could

Sorry, I forgot to include a reproducible example on my last e-mail but here it is: Since the file is large to be included here: The path to the foo.Rnw examples is: www.stat.umn.edu/~charlie/Sweave/foo.Rnw and is suppossed to produce a pdf like this one: http://www.stat.umn.edu/~charlie/Sweave/foo.pdf I have downloaded MiKTEX but I don't know how to make it work. Sweave and Stangle seem to

Hello all, This is the first time I write to the list. Sorry about my english... My Debian Sarge server was working perfectly with samba and winbind as a normal client in a Domain enviroment. I was able to share folders on my linux machine giving rights to the domain users. Everything was working until one day in that it crashed for some reason I don't know. I didn't touch anything of my

I'm trying to make an AMI call. I want to call a number, play an announcement when the call is answered, then call a second number and connect the two when the second call is answered. I an able to make a simple call to two numbers and connect them using the manager API but playing the announcement has me beat. Suggestions anyone? Bruce Ferrell

This seems to be a problem that goes back a long time - and I hope someone who understands what tre is suppossed to be doing will look at this. A short history of other people who have reported on this on different versions of AIX. I shall only add that I get the same results on AIX 5.3 TL7, AIX 6.1 TL9 and AIX 7.1 TL3. Basically, with settings that work for AIX and 32-bit - the only changes

On May 17, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > I don't know how much LLVM build system is tied to the GNU toolchain > or > how much it depends on *nix features, but suppossing that adding > support > for MSVC++ is impractical, perhaps it would be simpler to implement a > Makefile-based build system for MSVC++ than to keep up to date the > project files. This would support features like the one Anton mentions > on the other response to you, thus lessening...

Hi, I'm looking for some pointers on how to troubleshoot this problem. I'm trying to write a backend for the AVR. There is an undefined reference at line 48 which is the line FrameInfo() is on. I've tried to use the MSP430 and other targets as references so I'm not sure what changes I did would cause a problem on this line? AVRTargetMachine::AVRTargetMachine(const Target &T,

...; program will generate useless function calls but it's part of a binary > obfuscation chain. In LLVM there is no such a thing as a type default value. Maybe that concept exists on your language. Creating allocas is not the solution, as the alloca is just uninitialized space on the stack. Suppossing that the function parameters simple enough, like integral or floating point types, and the "default value" is zero, something like this will do (untested): std::vector<Value*> args; IRBuilder<> builder(bb,pos); for(Function::arg_iterator argit = f->arg_begin()...

...e makefiles if you wish. Just use this command: > > cmake -G "NMake Makefiles" > > but then you should use a different directory for the build. *nods* Or just omitting the argument and taking the default settings also works, provided you're in a different directory. > Suppossing that you have the LLVM source code in c:/llvm, do you have > > c:/llvm/tools/clang/CMakeLists.txt > > ? > > If that is not present, most likely your clang setup is wrong. The LLVM > cmake build test for the presence of the above file and, if found, > automatically builds cla...