Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "supportbg".
Did you mean:
support
2006 Jun 17
4
working patches for load balancing
...ded on 100% while
the other is utilised on 1 - 5%
I've read about Julians patches but they stop at 2.6.14.
Is anybody aware of similar patches for higher patchlevels. 2.6.14 is
not suitable for my setup
Thanks for reading :)
--
С уважение,
Владимир Витков
http://www.netsecad.com
http://www.supportbg.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2006 Jun 23
7
Multipath Routing Problems
Hi all :)
there is somekind of strange Routing problem that im getting with Linux-2.6.16 and iproute 2.6.16 , when i use command like :
ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 nexthop via 1.1.1.2 dev eth1
all packets goes on 1.1.1.2 ( always last interface ) , whats is the problem ? this situation also tested with equalize flag , on two physical interface and etc ...
--
Lady Luck
2007 Feb 15
2
monitoring hosts from my lan
Hi,
there is a way to graph host''s traffic from my lan ?
I''ve a linux router (2.4.x kernel), and a lan:
linux router : 192.168.1.254
host 1: 192.168.1.1
host 2: 192.168.1.2
host 3: 192.168.1.3
I''m looking for a way to graph traffic ( in / out )
from each 3 hosts, and store total traffic on a
mysql table, in order to make statistics later.
I think I can do with Mrtg,
2006 Jul 03
0
routing speciffic traffic over speciffic ISP
...p_rules1
question: Is this correct because it is causing more problems than
before it was employed?
Is the sequence ok i.e. mark the needed traffic, then add a rule
somewhere to direct it over one of the isps.
thanks in advance
--
С уважение,
Владимир Витков
http://www.netsecad.com
http://www.supportbg.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2007 May 05
3
Massive filtering
I am trying to build a trafic control rule set for a huge NATed network, and I have it working for single known addresses but I need to scale it to 16M potential client addresses. I''m using iptables for NAT. Incoming traffic is simple because I can match destination address, outgoing traffic I use iptables IPMARK then tc match mark and it works perfectly if I build rules for each client