Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "support_ccodes_over_32_typ".
Did you mean:
support_ccodes_over_32_types
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: CondCodeActions refactor (was RE: Why is this assertion here?)
...&& ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Micah
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hal Finkel
> Postdoctoral Appointee
> Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: support_ccodes_over_32_types.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1537 bytes
Desc: support_ccodes_over_32_types.patch
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120726/608071d6/attachment.obj>
2012 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: CondCodeActions refactor (was RE: Why is this assertion here?)
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 21:15:35 +0000
"Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
> Well, I found out the reason why this assert is here, and this is
> problematic.
>
> CondCodeActions only supports up to 32 different value types. Since
> we are past 32, what LLVM has is broken.
>
> Currently the 4 different Legalize states are stored in successive
>