search for: supoort

-- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161115/80fd3c17/attachment.html>

Hi all We're considering getting some Powerware 9355-30-M-0 UPSes to replace some older ones, so I wonder if it would be possible to use NUT for this. It seems 9315 is supported, but AFAICS that's the top model. Thanks roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 roy at karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det

...an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu > as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break > the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. > > As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. > > Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same > kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as > powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on > powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. Lock holder vCPU preemption can be detected by...

...an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu > as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break > the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. > > As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. > > Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same > kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as > powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on > powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. Lock holder vCPU preemption can be detected by...

...ds to the choice of using a single version of LLVM for a project (and thus have to manually incorporate bug fixes) or risk untimely breakage. I propose that the plugin be extended to allow plugable intrinsics. To be sucessful, such a plugin will have to provide hooks for basic AA information, DAG supoort and legalization, and code generation for some architectures. Any of the places that currently handle intrisics would have to be modified to check loaded libraries for all registered external intrinsics rather than failing on unknown intrinsics. This souldn't slow the processing of builtin in...

...l vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu ^^ takes > as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break > the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. >? > As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. >? > Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same ???^^ support > kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as > powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on ??^^ yield > powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. >? > Sugg...

...l vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu ^^ takes > as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break > the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. >? > As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. >? > Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same ???^^ support > kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as > powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on ??^^ yield > powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. >? > Sugg...

...tself. Currently kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng at gmail.com> Sugg...

...u_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu >> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break >> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. >> >> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. >> >> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same >> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as >> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on >> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. > > Lock holder vCPU preempti...

Hi..   R Program is shown ARIMA output as below then SARIMA equation is be   (1 - 0.991B^{12})z_t + 43.557 = (1+0.37B)(1-0,915B^{12})a_t    But I try to calculate it by manual . It look like it 's big different from R sofeware,   I am not sure this equation is correct or not . PLS supoort me to confirm it   Arima Model ( 0,0,1)(1,0,1)   No Transformation Constant   >> 43.557 , t = 10.09 MA         >> -0.37  , t = -4.806,Lag 1 AR,Seasonal>> 0.991  , t = 48.098,Lag 1 MR,Seasonal>> 0.915  , t = 9.487 ,Lag 1   Forcasting Output 42.06226126 37.74729393 37.592254...

...eration of the VIA Nehemiah and > > Ezra processors gets used, as found on VIA Epia boards. > [...] > > Thanks, patch is applied! That's quick! It just occured to me, OpenVPN has a config option to load specific OpenSSL engines. Furthermore in the future OpenSSL is said to be supoorting a "default engine", so that applications will not need to specify them themselves. What I'm trying to say, I'm not at all sure if this patch I sent was the way to go, I simply wanted my Padlock support to work :) -- Andreas [ http://unstable.nl | xmpp:andreas@...

Hello! I'm setting up Asterisk on a new system. In the past, all of my Asterisk boxes have either been embedded-style systems that do not supoort APIC, or multi-processor systems where APIC comes along with SMP. However, now I'm trying to install Asterisk on a single CPU (and non-HT) system that does support APIC (A P4 Northwood an Intel 845 chipset). I've used both RHEL3 and RHEL4 (and CentOS 3 as part of Asterisk@Home). For t...

change fomr v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues. test-case: perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g

change fomr v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues. test-case: perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g

Hi Friends, Something I'd like to shed some light on if possible - how is it that a single ISDN conversation only uses 64K for bidirectional communication (using ulaw, correct?), but on several occasions now have seen references to ulaw voip conversations using 64K per side of the conversation, plus packet overhead (http://www.zytrax.com/tech/protocols/voip_rates.htm - seems to be down

...cpu >>> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can >>> break >>> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. >>> >>> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. >>> >>> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same >>> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as >>> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on >>> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. >> >> >&...

...cpu >>> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can >>> break >>> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. >>> >>> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. >>> >>> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same >>> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as >>> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on >>> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. >> >> >&...

# uname -a Linux testbox 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # rpm -qa|grep zfs zfs-test-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-devel-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-devel-0.5.2-1 # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool1 120K 228G 21K /pool1 pool1/fs1 21K 228G 21K /vik [root at

...: Introduce IOCTL_CONDRV_GET_RENDERER_EVENTS ioctl. wineconsole: Use IOCTL_CONDRV_GET_RENDERER_EVENTS to fetch events. server: Remove no longer needed get_console_renderer_events request. wineconsole: Use OVERLAPPED to wait for console events. server: Remove no longer needed supoort for signaling console_input_events object. winebuild: Use asm_name for __wine_syscall. kernel32/tests: Add more invalid handle tests. server: Use separated fd ops for screen_buffer fd object. server: Introduce IOCTL_CONDRV_GET_OUTPUT_INFO ioctl. kernel32: Use IOCTL_CON...