search for: superstitious

...at attacking my > servers, will result in the loss of abuse nodes, hence they will not > bother me anymore. Not at all the case. > If every one would apply strategy B, the abuse problem would get less. No. The abuse problem wold be far worse. -- I thank my lucky stars I'm not superstitious.

...a look at the list of Certification > Authorities it comes with. > > I do see WoSign there (though I'd prefer to avoid my US located servers > have certificates signed by authority located in China, hence located sort > of behind "the great firewall of China" - call me superstitious). > > I do not see neither starttls.com nor letsencrypt.org between Authorities > certificates. I'm not an expert by any means, but I use letsencrypt (mostly for testing) and it's always worked for me in FreeBSD with Firefox, without any special effort on my part. You can try...

...9:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > I do see WoSign there (though I'd prefer to avoid my US located servers > have certificates signed by authority located in China, hence located sort > of behind "the great firewall of China" - call me superstitious). That?s a perfectly valid concern. The last I heard, modern browsers trust 1,100 CAs! Surely some of those CAs have interests that do not align with my interests. > I do not see neither starttls.com nor letsencrypt.org between Authorities > certificates. That?s because they are not top-...

On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su> wrote: > > Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g. > > http://www.startssl.com > http://buy.wosign.com/free Today, I would prefer Let?s Encrypt: https://letsencrypt.org/ It is philosophically aligned with the open source software world, rather than act as bait

Sorry, I couldn't resist, there are so many recipients... FROM THE DALAI LAMA: Do not keep this message. The mantra must leave your hands within 96 hours. You will get a very pleasant surprise. This is true, even if you are not superstitious. I N S T R U C T I O N S F O R L I F E 1. Take into account that great love and great achievements involve great risk. 2. When you lose, don't lose the lesson. 3. Follow the three Rs: Respect for self Respect for others and Responsibility for all your actions. 4. Remember that not gett...

...ve a patch release version on June 22. The nickname will be "Roasted Marshmallows". This is somewhat later than previous .1 releases, but we are also now aiming for an annual rather than biannual release scheme. There have been very few issues with 2.15.0, but some people may be waiting superstitiously for a .1 release (or expecting one come along any day now) and need to be informed about the plans. -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.c...

...t, on FreeBSD), and took a look at the list of Certification Authorities it comes with. I do see WoSign there (though I'd prefer to avoid my US located servers have certificates signed by authority located in China, hence located sort of behind "the great firewall of China" - call me superstitious). I do not see neither starttls.com nor letsencrypt.org between Authorities certificates. This means (correct me if I'm wrong) that client has to import one of these Certification Authorities certificates, otherwise server certificate signed by one of these authorities is on the same page with...

This is a follow up to an earlier post. Looking for a means to "individualize" incoming FAX, so as to distribute them to the intended recipient. While the PBX is based on Asterisk, it is not possible for me to "enter" the box to modify things, to any great degree. I thank those who mentioned IAXMODEM, earlier, but that seems a no go. Currently, there is a dedicated T1 into

I started to receive this kind of messages a few days ago on one of my servers: Message from syslogd@ at Mon Apr 29 08:02:55 2013 ... server1 kernel: EDAC MC0: UE row 0, channel-a= 0 channel-b= 1 labels "-": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=0 RDWR=Read RAS=0 CAS=0, UE Err=0x2 (Aliased Uncorrectable Non-Mirrored Demand Data ECC)) I've never had ECC memory to fail on me before, so now I am

Full_Name: Stefan Raberger Version: 2.8.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (213.185.163.242) Hi there, I recently noticed some strange behaviour of the command "type.convert", depending on the startup mode used. But there also seems to be different behaviour on different PCs (all running the same OS and the same version of R). On PC1: When I start R in SDI mode (RGui --no-save

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 13:24, Marc Roos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > Say for instance you have some one trying to constantly access an > account > > > Has any of you made something creative like this: > > * configure that account to allow to login with any password > * link that account to something like /dev/zero that generates infinite

In "The future of Telephony", it says "... We should also note for security's sake you should always make sure that your [incoming] context never allows outbound dialing. (If by chance it did, people could dial into your system and make outbound toll calls that would be charged to you!) The book was demonstrating using a PSTN environment and the zapata.conf was something like:

I've installed Samba 3.0.2 (from the source) on a SuSE 8.2 system with MIT Kerberos 1.3.1 (I uninstalled the Heimdal code) and the OpenLDAP 2.1.27 development libraries installed on it. I want to make this system a domain member of a Win2K native-mode ADS domain but can't get "net ads join" to work. I've run "kinit myid@MYDOMAIN.COM" and I get at ticket, but when

I really hate to have to make a post like this, but I feel I have little choice but to relay to the group my experience with Teliax, and explain why I recommend against using them as a primary Voip-> PSTN provider. I hope that a letter like this will inspire companies like Teliax to work harder at customer service, as well as circuit stability. We need more companies that offer the types of

Hello Tim, Wow, great documentation! ? That really clears a lot of the terminology? for me. We have to remove our Win2008R2 Servers before Jan2020.?? Hopefully Samba 4.11.x will permit us to join a Win2012R2 Server at a 2008R2 functional level...? Your documentation gives steps on how to do this.? But I need some clarifications... Here's my understanding of the workflow: 1. Upgrade

Someone I was speaking with this evening claimed they have installed the latest named rpms yet they are still getting exploited daily and being hacked. Do the latest rpm''s for the named 4.9.x stuff fix all the root exploits or is this person just an idiot who probably has holes elsewhere in the system?