search for: superredcloth_inlin

Hello, I''m having some issues building r190 on Leopard (10.5.1): $ rake (in /Users/johan/temp/superredcloth) ragel superredcloth_scan.rl | rlgen-cd -G2 -o superredcloth_scan.c ragel superredcloth_inline.rl | rlgen-cd -G2 -o superredcloth_inline.c /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby extconf.rb checking for main() in -lc... yes creating Makefile make gcc -I. -I. -I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/universal- darwin9.0 -I. -fno-c...

...conf.rb install superredcloth --source http://code.whytheluckystiff.net checking for main() in -lc... yes creating Makefile make gcc -I. -I. -I/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/universal-darwin9.0 -I. -fno-common -arch ppc -arch i386 -Os -pipe -fno-common -c superredcloth_inline.c Out of stack space. Try running ''ulimit -S -s unlimited'' in the shell to raise its limit. {standard input}:unknown:Undefined local symbol L_rb_hash_aref$stub {standard input}:unknown:Undefined local symbol L_rb_num2long$stub {standard input}:unknown:Undefined local symbol L_rb_...

Rev. 190 Ragel 5.7 The following command had already eaten 1.5 GB RAM when I killed it: ragel superredcloth_inline.rl | rlcodegen -G2 -o superredcloth_inline.c -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, all. I haven''t felt at liberty to go axing test cases, but some of the 33 that are failing now are ones I don''t think we want to pass? cruft coming from Markdown or made up to fill a gap some years ago. I''d like to float the proposition that we make Super (and thus RedCloth 4) behave as identically as possible to Textile2 as working on