search for: supernetted

Hi, I have a question about the routing to the tun device. As I understand the tincd vpn solution, each side could add and delete subnets to the vpn, and these "routing" updates are send to every participating vpn node, so every node knows all subnets and the node where to send the traffic for it. But, beside this, the operating system needs a way to distinguish between traffic

Hi there, I have a question with regards to cascading multiple HTB qdiscs. Assume that I want to build the following hierarchy: (qdisc htb 1:0) -> (class htb 1:1) -> (qdisc htb 2:0) -> (class htb 2:1) -> (class htb 2:2) I want to attache aggregate u32 filters at 1:0 for supernets, then at 2:0 (and 3:0, 4:0, etc), I attach the more specific u32 filters for say HTTP and

Just for the record, I'd like to report that tinc works just find on MacOS 10.5. I built lzo2 from macports.org, installed the tun/tap driver from http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~nissler/tuntap/, and compiled tinc myself. The only confusing part was figuring out the tinc-up bits to make everything happy on MacOS. Here's the trick: ifconfig $INTERFACE <mac client ip> <the same

...hoping to draw some extra attention because I got NO reply whatsoever to the original posting :( I would really appreciate if someone could comment om which of both strategies as described below is best. I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are linked over the internet through a IPSec gateway to gateway (network to network) connection (i.e. all machines can reach/ping each other on both subnets). The samba PDC (with LDAP backend) has IP 192.168.0.4 and there is a BDC (LDAP slave) in the other...

Hi! I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are linked over the internet through a IPSec gateway to gateway (network to network) connection (i.e. all machines can reach/ping each other on both subnets). The samba PDC (with LDAP backend) has IP 192.168.0.4 and there is a BDC (LDAP slave) in the other...

Hi, I believe the issues raised by this message are the same as mine, more on a commercial sense than for self use, but mostly the same. I've seen posts where real-life installations are mentioned, but not a reference to how Asterisk is working on production (and productive) environments. Any experiences would be very welcome I believe, not only on pure technical, but wider, sense. Thanks

Good Evening, I am trying to forward packages on an internal device using iptables: /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT but the packages are still blocked, e.g.: Feb 6 20:58:28 firewall kernel: DROP-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.100.177 DST=172.28.2.184 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=16609 PROTO=TCP SPT=7166 DPT=3590 WINDOW=0

While I was tying down a supernet to the discard interface, the box crashed on me. Its a STABLE box from June 4th. I was in zebra at the time and thought I would route a /24 to ds0 instead of to the IP on ds0 (which I had done for a number of other aggregate routes). The only other "strange" thing about the box is that ds0 is loaded via kld. I will see if I can reproduce it on a