Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "superfan".
2018 Sep 25
2
RFC Storing BB order in llvm::Instruction for faster local dominance
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>
> To echo what Hal said, yes, it's a major change, but I think the improved complexity guarantees, simplicity, and elimination of certain classes of bugs is worth it.
>
> I think we have consensus that we should go forward with this. Would anyone mind formally stamping it in phab? So far everyone
2018 Sep 25
2
RFC Storing BB order in llvm::Instruction for faster local dominance
...you done any memory use analysis or compile time impact analysis of
> this change? Have you consider the algorithm I mentioned? I am not
> motivated by your rationale above, and I think it will be a huge step
> forward and effectively define away the problem.
>
> To be clear, I’m a superfan of your work and agree that “automatic
> invalidation and simplification” are good goals. I’d just love to see more
> analysis of the situation before burning space on this extra field.
>
> For example, it would be very interesting to see what the typical
> distribution of local dom...