search for: sunserver

Hi, Please correct me if I''m wrong but it seems to me that in the case of a remote file source the path must contain the plain filename after the module and paths with directory elements are not supported. What I wanted is the following: +++++ fileserver.conf +++++ [system] path /services/puppet/common/ allow * +++++ site.pp +++++++++++++ file {

...eld ----- Original Message ----- From: samba-bounces+egold=fsa.com Sent: 09/20/2004 06:01 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] failed tcon_X with NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED can someone please tell me why im getting this error, i can join my other AD servers just this one fails. root@sunserver:/usr/local/samba/var# net join -d 3 -w fsa.com -S WIN2KSERVER -U Administrator [2004/09/20 17:58:31, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(3897) lp_load: refreshing parameters [2004/09/20 17:58:31, 3] param/loadparm.c:init_globals(1307) Initialising global parameters [2004/09/20 17:58:31, 3] param/params...

...DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED [2004/09/14 15:03:40, 2] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(318) waiting for a connection [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (192.168.21.144) [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(105) netbios connect: name1=sunserver name2=ACH2000 [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(112) netbios connect: local=sunserver remote=ach2000, name type = 0 [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(591) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resourc...

...DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED [2004/09/14 15:03:40, 2] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(318) waiting for a connection [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (192.168.21.144) [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(105) netbios connect: name1=sunserver name2=ACH2000 [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(112) netbios connect: local=sunserver remote=ach2000, name type = 0 [2004/09/14 15:03:41, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(591) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resourc...

Hello, We installed dovecot-0.99.10.2 on Monday and upgraded to dovecot-0.99.10.4 today, but our eudora users still are very unhappy: old undeleted mail messages are donwloaded every time they use our server. Looking into the source code, we found that dovecot knows about the following status flags: A: answered F: flagged (?) T: draft (?) R: seen (read) D: deleted

Hello, According to our experiences, most recent dovecot incompatible with eudora pop3 client - eudora (5.1, 6), pop3, 'leave on server' enabled: the clients receive the full inbox *every time* they check the inbox on the server. [Users using other MUAs experienced the same once, at switching from uw-pop3d/imapd to dovecot.] That is absolutely devastating, especially for home users

How are people upgrading puppet itself on their hosts that run puppetd? Can puppet be used to upgrade to a new puppet package via gem, rpm or some other package provider? How do you handle restarting? Just hoping theres a better way than "ssh and a for loop" or having to have another configuration management system installed.

There was a discussion a while ago about adding inheritance to definitions. There is a need for a way to specialize parameters while allowing passing other options. This comes up with remotefile where it would be nice to have a default server location but not specify all the parameters (and their defaults) in the definition. Was there a change to the syntax? Is there a way to accomplish this?

There''s definitely enough complexity in some of the modules out there to warrant solid test coverage, especially if people start extending a module to support more distributions and OSes, while trying to keep the existing support working. That''s even before you start thinking about functions, facts, and native types. They''re *really* in need of solid testing, being all

...lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/ Hello People. We are trying to run Samba 2.0.9 on a Sun Sparc running Solaris 7. Nothing fancy - just disc and printer sharing. It almost works perfectly . . . Except: The processes that start on the Sunserver when a user logs in on a PC DO NOT terminate when that user logs out. The result is a ridiculous number of smb processes running for a fairly small number of PCs. Users are experiencing uncertain access to disc shares; failure to find and/or save files to shares etc. Has anyone run across this...

...t;> Tony House 06/05 5:35 AM >>> > Hello People. > > We are trying to run Samba 2.0.9 on a Sun Sparc running > Solaris 7. Nothing fancy - just disc and printer > sharing. > > It almost works perfectly . . . > > Except: > The processes that start on the Sunserver when a user > logs in on a PC DO NOT terminate when that user logs > out. The result is a ridiculous number of smb > processes running for a fairly small number of PCs. > > Users are experiencing uncertain access to disc shares; > failure to find and/or save files to shares etc...