Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "sunoses".
2005 Dec 05
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
...cur easily 
> enough), it could be helpful. Incidentally, IMHO the way it is coded in 
> INSTALL.in (I didn't know about INSTALL.in, sorry) is a bit unusual; cd 
> does not seem to be required by the POSIX standard to have non-zero exit 
> status when it fails (and in fact, on older SunOSes, 'cd 
> non/existant/directory' returns 0). But that is
But it _is_ so required:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cd.html
How old are `older SunOSes'?  Solaris 8 (which is 4 years old) is 
POSIX-compilant here, and I would be surprised if any from the last d...
2005 Dec 05
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
...which I think can occur easily enough), it could be 
helpful. Incidentally, IMHO the way it is coded in INSTALL.in (I didn't know 
about INSTALL.in, sorry) is a bit unusual; cd does not seem to be required by 
the POSIX standard to have non-zero exit status when it fails (and in fact, 
on older SunOSes, 'cd non/existant/directory' returns 0). But that is 
probably more a matter of style, more than anything else. Regards,
                                                                       Philip
-- 
Philip Lijnzaad
Genomics Laboratory
Dept. of Biomedical Genetics
University Medical Ce...
2005 Dec 07
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
...always a good idea). But the issue will 
affect any POSIX-compliant shell.
> But it _is_ so required:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cd.html
Sorry, I missed that. And I agree that it's the most logical thing to do when 
cd fails. 
> How old are `older SunOSes'?  Solaris 8 (which is 4 years old) is
> POSIX-compilant here, and I would be surprised if any from the last decade
> was not (at least with suitable paths set).
SunOS 5.7 (which admittedly is ancient; I can't find the year, google.com is 
currently unreachable for me) doesn't do...