Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "sunoses".
2005 Dec 05
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
...cur easily
> enough), it could be helpful. Incidentally, IMHO the way it is coded in
> INSTALL.in (I didn't know about INSTALL.in, sorry) is a bit unusual; cd
> does not seem to be required by the POSIX standard to have non-zero exit
> status when it fails (and in fact, on older SunOSes, 'cd
> non/existant/directory' returns 0). But that is
But it _is_ so required:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cd.html
How old are `older SunOSes'? Solaris 8 (which is 4 years old) is
POSIX-compilant here, and I would be surprised if any from the last d...
2005 Dec 05
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
...which I think can occur easily enough), it could be
helpful. Incidentally, IMHO the way it is coded in INSTALL.in (I didn't know
about INSTALL.in, sorry) is a bit unusual; cd does not seem to be required by
the POSIX standard to have non-zero exit status when it fails (and in fact,
on older SunOSes, 'cd non/existant/directory' returns 0). But that is
probably more a matter of style, more than anything else. Regards,
Philip
--
Philip Lijnzaad
Genomics Laboratory
Dept. of Biomedical Genetics
University Medical Ce...
2005 Dec 07
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
...always a good idea). But the issue will
affect any POSIX-compliant shell.
> But it _is_ so required:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cd.html
Sorry, I missed that. And I agree that it's the most logical thing to do when
cd fails.
> How old are `older SunOSes'? Solaris 8 (which is 4 years old) is
> POSIX-compilant here, and I would be surprised if any from the last decade
> was not (at least with suitable paths set).
SunOS 5.7 (which admittedly is ancient; I can't find the year, google.com is
currently unreachable for me) doesn't do...