search for: summmari

Hello, I'd like to propose an extension to the function summary.aov. In Splus (2000, I don't know about other versions), summary.aov allows a parameter ssType to be set to 1 or 3 (defaults to 1) to choose the type of Sums of Squares. I know I can get Type III SS in R with drop1(model), but including the functionality into summary.aov would, in my opinion, - yield a more usable table

--begin inclusion --- I am trying to extract output information from the survfit function in order to generate a matrix of select output for multiple factors. Specifically, I am interested in extracting the number of events (in the output below: 106, 2, 3). The variable names represented in my function (ee) are shown below, but none of those variables correspond to the column of events as shown

Dear All, When I run rlm to obtain robust standard errors, my output does not include p-values. Is there any reason p-values should not be used in this case? Is there an argument I could use in rlm so that the output does include p-values? Thanks in advance, Celso [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm very new to R so maybe i'm doing something wrong so please let me know it that is that case. Here is an example where the summary() and residuals() applied to lm object produce different results (I think the residuals() results is correct since SAS produces those numbers - the second residual corresponding to observation with weight 4 is wrong in summary()). x <- c( 10, 20, 30, 40

Why Ruby on Rails won''t become mainstream http://beust.com/weblog/archives/000382.html Kind of interesting, but didn''t convince me. Though, yeah, I can imagine a lot of naive programmers sticking with PHP and VB (the type of crowd that also doesn''t run their own servers, so they''re dependent on hosts offering Rails for them). Rails DOES have an IDE - soon