search for: sumesh

...te over all MachineFunctions, emulating them. I used to do this by iterating over all Module Function's, and using MachineFunction::get() to get the MachineFunction associated with said Function. In LLVM 2.6, MachineFunction::get() is gone. What is the new way of doing what I need? thanks Sumesh

...ional. http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedVS.html The page says - "This step is currently optional as LLVM does still come with a normal Visual Studio solution file, but it is not always kept up-to-date and will soon be deprecated in favor of the multi-platform generator CMake." thanks Sumesh

...er is a member of domain too. Now we have decided to migrate the File server to RHEL 4. Could anyone help me out to have this exact setup with Linux OS. Any documents or tips? Is there any limitation if we change file server alone to Linux? Your help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in Advance Sumesh

Hi If I am linking a large library with my app, is there a way I can eliminate all the unused functions used in the library as part of the linking ? thanks shrey

shreyas krishnan wrote: > Hi > If I am linking a large library with my app, is there a way I can > eliminate all the unused functions used in the library as part of the > linking ? > If you are talking about static libraries (.a), this is done automatically by linker. You shouldn't have to worry about this. If you are talking about the shared library (.so) -- it will be