search for: sumcol

...ingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck > TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat > TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat > TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat > TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol > TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol > TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol > TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc > TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc > TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Sh...

...ve TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc TEST-FAIL:...

LLVMers, The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/ If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd also appreciate any documentation reviews. Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You should see one XPASS for

...hmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hello SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-expr_stmt SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-14-initialize-string SingleSource/Regress...

...Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/dry | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Quicksort...

...0.05 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat | 0.0112 3392 0.0090 * 0.0107 | 0.77 0.75 0.83 * 0.82 | 1.03 0.93 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol | 0.0063 3276 0.0073 * 0.0070 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0111 3584 0.0110 * 0.0103...

...0.05 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat | 0.0000 2472 0.0120 * 0.0160 | 0.56 0.67 0.66 * 0.68 | 0.84 0.85 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol | 0.0120 2136 0.0080 * 0.0080 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0080 2176 0.0040 * 0.0040...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.05 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat | 0.0157 2420 0.0100 * 0.0102 | 0.56 0.88 0.88 * 0.88 | 0.64 0.64 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol | 0.0053 2084 0.0082 * 0.0057 | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0075 2124 0.0093 * 0.0067...

...0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat | 0.0038 3428 0.0054 * 0.0058 | 0.18 0.22 0.23 * 0.24 | 0.82 0.78 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol | 0.0032 3304 0.0037 * 0.0038 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0044 3616 0.0053 * 0.0052...

...0.09 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat                              | > 0.0699 10564    0.0500      *                0.0399      |    0.15 * >  0.10 *           0.15 | n/a     1.50    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol                              | > 0.0499 9016     0.0400      *                0.0400      |    0.00    0.01 >  0.00 *           0.04 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc                                  | > 0.0599 11144    0.0400      *          ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ > strcat | 0.0699 10564 0.0500 > * 0.0399 | 0.15 * 0.10 * > 0.15 | n/a 1.50 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ > sumcol | 0.0499 9016 0.0400 > * 0.0400 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * > 0.04 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ > wc | 0.0599 11144 0.0400 &g...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...03147 0 0.02 102930 subsumption.ll 129 312529 7 0.03 310822 0 0.03 306700 suicide.ll 1 7123 0 0.01 7097 0 0.01 7097 sumarray2d.ll 2 7997 0 0.01 7985 0 0.01 7985 sumarray-dbl.ll 2 7099 0 0.01 7083 0 0.01 7083 sumarray.ll 2 5552 0 0.01 5536 0 0.01 5536 sumarraymalloc.ll 5 8625 0 0.01 8613 0 0.01 8613 sumcol.ll 15 21294 0 0.01 21269 0 0.01 21269 support.ll 10 85089 0 0.01 85055 0 0.01 85055 susan.ll 21 617846 0 0.06 617812 0 0.06 617812 symbol.ll 10 28263 0 0.01 28234 0 0.01 28521 symm.ll 12 28959 0 0.01 28911 0 0.01 28911 sym_tab.ll 3 9832 0 0.01 9802 0 0.01 9802 symtab.ll 5 13680 0 0.01 13654 0 0.01...