search for: sumarray

...[3]: *** [Output/simple.cbe.c] Aborted (core dumped) gcc-4.2 -m32 Output/simple.cbe.c -o Output/simple.cbe -Wl,-melf_i386 -Wl,-melf_i386 -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-inline gcc-4.2: Output/simple.cbe.c: No such file or directory make[3]: [Output/simple.cbe] Error 1 (ignored) gcc-4.2 -m32 Output/sumarray-dbl.cbe.c -o Output/sumarray-dbl.cbe -Wl,-melf_i386 -Wl,-melf_i386 -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-inline Output/sumarray-dbl.cbe.c:130: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'malloc' Output/sumarray-dbl.cbe.c: In function 'main': Output/sumarray-dbl.cbe.c:195: error: ex...

Hi Dale, Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at this time. I did try: llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? Thx, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January...

On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:55 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at > this > time. I did try: > > llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc > llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc > gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s > > And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). > > Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? That won't work in the general case, because there are things about the ABI, su...

...llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl ^^ all of the above fail because my 3.4.6 compiler doesn't su...

I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch. To check out the release branch: cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r

llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi, > > I am using the llvm-gcc 4.0 front end binaries from llvm.org on an > intel > mac running 10.5.8. A couple of questions: > > 1) these binaries have "darwin8" as part of the file name. Are these > compatible with OS X 10.5.8 aka darwin9? >

...bject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question > > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:55 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > >> Hi Dale, >> >> Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at >> this >> time. I did try: >> >> llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc >> llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc >> gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s >> >> And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). >> >> Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? > > That won't work in the general case, because the...

Hi, I am using the llvm-gcc 4.0 front end binaries from llvm.org on an intel mac running 10.5.8. A couple of questions: 1) these binaries have "darwin8" as part of the file name. Are these compatible with OS X 10.5.8 aka darwin9? 2) assuming (1) is ok, if I compile a hello world program using: gcc -arch ppc hello.c, I get a ppc binary, but if I use llvm-gcc -arch ppc hello.c, I get an

...bject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question > > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:55 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > >> Hi Dale, >> >> Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at >> this >> time. I did try: >> >> llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc >> llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc >> gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s >> >> And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). >> >> Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? > > That won't work in the general case, because the...

...r_member SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method2 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR10189 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 SingleSource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2...

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, heisenbug wrote: >> point taken. thanks! > > > Whatever I try I get something like this: > > ggreif$ cd MultiSource/ > ggreif$ make > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/be.bc', needed by `Output/ > burg.linked.rbc'. Stop. > make[1]: *** [Burg/.makeall] Error 2 > make: *** [Applications/.makeall] Error 2 This is the

On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > heisenbug wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > > > ... > > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test > > >>>

...Source/UnitTests/Threads/2010-12-08-tls | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/divides | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies...

...gleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/divides TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl * The above tests fail due to either lack of SSE3 hardware on my machine or lack of support for vector types in my compiler. TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2 TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++...

...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0038 460 0.0014 * 0.0014 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray | 0.0067 892 0.0045 * 0.0044 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d | 0.0100 1060 0.0059 * 0...

...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0000 444 0.0000 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray | 0.0040 880 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d | 0.0040 1012 0.0080 * 0...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0037 456 0.0011 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray | 0.0081 872 0.0109 * 0.0041 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d | 0.0053 1020 0.0059 * 0...

...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0013 480 0.0007 * 0.0006 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray | 0.0121 956 0.0022 * 0.0022 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d | 0.0040 1148 0.0027 * 0...

...      0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic                             | > 0.0100 488      0.0000      *                0.0100      |    0.00    0.01 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray                                       | > 0.0100 948      0.0100      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d                                     | > 0.0100 1108     0.0100      *  ...