search for: sultant

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sultant".

Did you mean: sultan
2008 Jun 17
1
re sultant column names from reshape::cast, with a fun.aggregate vector
...would fix it up, but no dice: cast(scores.melt, grade ~ variable, fun.aggregate = c(mean, num.neg = function(x) sum(x < 0))) that is, why not look at names(fun.aggregate)? or am I missing something? thanks, Mike I would think that -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/resultant-column-names-from-reshape%3A%3Acast%2C-with-a-fun.aggregate-vector-tp17910885p17910885.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2006 Apr 20
2
Red Hat Enterprise and samba
...in ni celles des membres de son groupe. Bien que l'?metteur de ce message ait fait tout son possible pour maintenir son syst?me informatique sans virus, il ne peut garantir que cette transmission ne comporte aucun virus et il ne pourra ?tre tenu pour responsable de quelque dommage que ce soit r?sultant de la transmission d'un virus. ******************************************** This electronic transmission is confidential. It may contain information that is covered by legal professional privilege, work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received this transmission in error, you...
2004 Dec 11
3
rsync to retry if copy failed - possible?
Hello, I want to be 100% sure that rsync copies something from one location to another. However, I did not see an option which would make rsync retry an operation if it failed for whatever reason (network was down when rsync started, or network went down during rsync was copying something, connection timed out etc.). For example, wget has an option like --tries=number Set number of retries
2013 Oct 01
2
sshd accepted fingerprint logging
Currently, LogLevel must be set to VERBOSE to see the fingerprint of an accepted key, and the default LogLevel is INFO. Since this is useful security information, I would like to propose that the 'Accepted publickey' message be modified to include the fingerprint of the accepted key. Is this a reasonable solution? Here is an example log snippet with LogLevel VERBOSE: Oct 1 15:23:24