search for: suchfileor

...effc at jolt-lang.org> > Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List > <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': > No suchfileor directory > Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:05:39 -0800 > >> Out of curiosity, did it accept the solution and project files as is, >> or did it want to "upgrade" >them? If the latter, I cannot accept >> any patches for those files because they would break VC++ >...

...ws---- From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h':No suchfileor directory Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:40:13 -0800 Henrik Bach wrote: >----Original Message Follows---- >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List ><llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >To: LLVM Developers Mailing...

...s---- From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No suchfileor directory Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:05:39 -0800 >Yes, it should find windows.h with the default configuration. But you have >to be suspicious of >beta code that Microsoft gives out for free. It might >just be very buggy, or it might be >deliberately crippled. Considering the &...

...jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List > <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: > 'windows.h':No suchfileor directory > Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:40:13 -0800 > > Henrik Bach wrote: > >> ----Original Message Follows---- >> From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >> Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List >> <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.e...

On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 08:40, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Groan... it's bad enough they keep breaking backwards compatibility, > but what's much worse is that the upgrade is never 100% correct. Builds > are broken in subtle and hard to track down ways. It's why VS upgrades > get put off for as long as possible. I won't even think of upgrading to > Whidbey until

...<jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List ><llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h':No >suchfileor directory >Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:40:13 -0800 > >Henrik Bach wrote: > >>----Original Message Follows---- >>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >>Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List >><llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>...

Yes, it should find windows.h with the default configuration. But you have to be suspicious of beta code that Microsoft gives out for free. It might just be very buggy, or it might be deliberately crippled. Considering the price tag on Visual Studio, it's one or the other (and probably both). Out of curiosity, did it accept the solution and project files as is, or did it want to

----Original Message Follows---- From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No suchfile or directory Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:29:47 -0800