search for: sucessors

My UPS is an Exide NetUPS SE PRC1500i (1500 VA), also known as Powerware 5119, according to Karl Schmidt (http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2005-July/000026.html) also Deltec PowerRite Pro II, and according to http://www.usedups.de/compaq_ups.html also Compaq R3000h. I am not sure if the information in http://www.bps.hu/powerware/model_en.html is to be interpreted as that it was

My UPS is an Exide NetUPS SE PRC1500i (1500 VA), also known as Powerware 5119, according to Karl Schmidt (http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2005-July/000026.html) also Deltec PowerRite Pro II, and according to http://www.usedups.de/compaq_ups.html also Compaq R3000h. I am not sure if the information in http://www.bps.hu/powerware/model_en.html is to be interpreted as that it was

...Conceptually this is similar to Branch Profile: edgeProbability(src, dest) == edgeWeight(src, dest) / (sum edgeWeight(src, succ) for succ in src.successors()) As with branch profile, these edge weights express branch probability as the ratio between a successor edge and the sum of all other sucessors originating from the same branch. They do not need to sum to a fixed value, so all successor edge weights can be scaled without changing the probability. Edge weights associated with different branches cannot be meaningfully compared. It's easy and inexpensive to recompute branch probability w...

...corresponding standard for laying out the filesystem within the available storage (ISO 9660). There is also the fact that a CD player was expected to implemented in hardware or with a very simple processor so the format had to be simple. By the time DVD was being designed (and it's subequent sucessors to be) CD-ROM has been around for a while and DVD players were expected to have internal software that could cope with the complexity of working with a filesystem on the disk rather than a simple data stream. Steve.

does anybody know why dvd use files for audio and video but audio cd's not? What could be the reason for this? e.g. they could make a file for each track and just put them on an audio cd and make cd players compatible with this format. So for me it has always been a mystery why audio cd's work this way. does anybody knows if super audio cd's still work the same as normal ones?

On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Executive summary > ----------------- > > Remove the personality and list of catches out of eh.selector and stick them > directly on invoke instructions. > > The invoke instruction > ---------------------- > > The invoke instruction is modified by adding extra catch info to it: > > <result> = invoke

Here is an alternative proposal to Bill's. It is closer to what we already have (which can be seen as a good or a bad thing!), and is also closer to what gcc does. It is more incremental than Bill's and introduces fewer new concepts. Executive summary ----------------- Remove the personality and list of catches out of eh.selector and stick them directly on invoke instructions. The

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:44 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > The reason I'm looking for solutions that can work without "scanning the > > code" or "spooky action at a distance" is that we should have a solution > > that's easily digestible by folks who are not aware of GPU execution > models. > > > > The fallback

On 31.01.19 15:59, Jan Sjodin wrote: >> >  Any transform that re-arranges control flow would potentially have to >> >  know about the properties of ballot(), and the rules with respect to >> >  the CFG (and maybe consider the target) to know where to insert the >> >  intrinsics. > >> But the same is true for basically any approach to handling this. In