search for: succeeed

> Does it work if you manually add userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD to your clients ldap entry and reexport the keytab? I already thought about trying that. So by now, I tried tweaking the client's LDAP entry. Adding userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD does not succeeed, however, after reviewing the ldap filter once again, I added userPrincipalName=nfs/client02.domain.tld at DOMAIN.TLD to the workstation's account and finally, the mount does not return an error anymore. Though I can't access anything on the mounted share but I guess that's OK for...

...o your clients ldap entry >> > and reexport the keytab? >> >> I already thought about trying that. So by now, I tried tweaking the >> client's LDAP entry. >> >> Adding >> >> userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD >> >> does not succeeed, however, after reviewing the ldap filter once >> again, I added >> >> userPrincipalName=nfs/client02.domain.tld at DOMAIN.TLD >> >> to the workstation's account and finally, the mount does not return >> an error anymore. Though I can't access anythi...

Hey Guys, Again, I am just learning Rails, so I am asking advice here. I have a model called Company which has many Owners. The Owners model indicates the name of the owner and their share (as a percentage) of the company. The total shares for any one company can not be more than 100%. So if I have 10 owners each with 10% of the company and I update one of the owners and set their share to 11%,

...) defined to a non-empty value b) defined to an empty value c) undefined However case c) causes problems - in templatewrapper.rb::method_missing it causes an error to be thrown. I''ve changed my copy so that it merely warns instead and returns nil. Interestingly the defined? check _never_ succeeeds - it always returns false :( I''ve done some google to see if anyone else has been doing optional bits like this but couldn''t see any which makes me suspicious. Is this a reasonable thing to expect? If the "correct" approach is to define all variables in the base cla...

...ention of dlopen, samba_dlz works. > yes/no ->> its not displaying the DLZ file open <<- and that happen even on my now +1J old samba4.0 RPI samba4 ad. and thats why i reviewd the posted Bind startup we both know if the dlopen not happen cleanly , then any zoneload will be never succeeed. At monent i?m build bind 9.9.5.7 on one of RPi cluster nodes , will tell you next days the Outcome and named -V output from package and selfcompiled. Compiling bind on RPI-II ( not croscompiling ) takes 4-6h , samba4 ~13-17h . -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Best Regards Horst Venzke ; PGP NET :...

...userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD to your clients ldap entry > > and reexport the keytab? > > I already thought about trying that. So by now, I tried tweaking the > client's LDAP entry. > > Adding > > userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD > > does not succeeed, however, after reviewing the ldap filter once > again, I added > > userPrincipalName=nfs/client02.domain.tld at DOMAIN.TLD > > to the workstation's account and finally, the mount does not return > an error anymore. Though I can't access anything on the mounted share...

...eexport the keytab? > >> > >> I already thought about trying that. So by now, I tried tweaking > >> the client's LDAP entry. > >> > >> Adding > >> > >> userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD > >> > >> does not succeeed, however, after reviewing the ldap filter once > >> again, I added > >> > >> userPrincipalName=nfs/client02.domain.tld at DOMAIN.TLD > >> > >> to the workstation's account and finally, the mount does not > >> return an error anymore. Th...

...userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD >> to your clients ldap entry and reexport the keytab? > > I already thought about trying that. So by now, I tried tweaking the > client's LDAP entry. > > Adding > > userPrincipalName=CLIENT02.DOMAIN.TLD > > does not succeeed, however, after reviewing the ldap filter once again, > I added > > userPrincipalName=nfs/client02.domain.tld at DOMAIN.TLD > > to the workstation's account and finally, the mount does not return > an error anymore. Though I can't access anything on the mounted share...

...ba_dlz works. >> > yes/no ->> its not displaying the DLZ file open <<- and that happen even on my now +1J old samba4.0 RPI samba4 ad. > > and thats why i reviewd the posted Bind startup > we both know if the dlopen not happen cleanly , then any zoneload will be never succeeed. > > At monent i?m build bind 9.9.5.7 on one of RPi cluster nodes , will tell you next days the Outcome and named -V output from package and selfcompiled. Compiling bind on RPI-II ( not croscompiling ) takes 4-6h , samba4 ~13-17h . Hi, ok I take your point, but the OP never mentioned Rpi, c...

On 28.01.2014 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote: >> Hi there! >> >> I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the >> config: >> >> >> >> <idmap> >> >> <uid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> >>

...under one of the previous projects (Call it X), then there would be a tendancy to just give everyone from the other project (Call it Y) a developer account, start merging the code from Y and say "Merge done!". This will NOT work, all of us feel pretty strongly that for the new project to succeeed it needs to include the best aspects of both Beryl and Compiz, and under the envelope of the already established Project X it's difficult and possibly impossible to integrate the 'core' (not as in beryl-core as in metaphorical core), of Y properly. It's better to start from a blank...

Hi All, I just noticed something interesting. When a sip device registers and regcontext is setup in sip.conf, a NoOp priority 1 extension is dynamically created in the dialplan within the specified regcontext. Works great. If for some reason, modification is made to the extension.conf and a >reload extension is performed, those dynamically created extensions in the regcontext vanish. Now

...t; > > yes/no ->> its not displaying the DLZ file open <<- and that happen even on my now +1J old samba4.0 RPI samba4 ad. > > > > and thats why i reviewd the posted Bind startup > > we both know if the dlopen not happen cleanly , then any zoneload will be never succeeed. > > > > At monent i?m build bind 9.9.5.7 on one of RPi cluster nodes , will tell you next days the Outcome and named -V output from package and selfcompiled. Compiling bind on RPI-II ( not croscompiling ) takes 4-6h , samba4 ~13-17h . > > Hi, ok I take your point, but the OP ne...

...gt; yes/no ->> its not displaying the DLZ file open <<- and that happen even on my now +1J old samba4.0 RPI samba4 ad. >>> >>> and thats why i reviewd the posted Bind startup >>> we both know if the dlopen not happen cleanly , then any zoneload will be never succeeed. >>> >>> At monent i?m build bind 9.9.5.7 on one of RPi cluster nodes , will tell you next days the Outcome and named -V output from package and selfcompiled. Compiling bind on RPI-II ( not croscompiling ) takes 4-6h , samba4 ~13-17h . >> Hi, ok I take your point, but the O...

Hello , review bind9 options ... >> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: starting BIND 9.9.5-7-Debian -u >> bind -4 >> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: built with '--prefix=/usr' >> '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' >> '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--enable-threads'

...the kernel will either use capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) which only succeeds in the host, or ns_capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) which is allowed to suceed in the container. Different filesystems have differing restrictions, but at this time the vast majority of filesystems require that capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) succeeed and thus you can only mount them in the host.", and discussion about "allow some kernel filesystems to be mounted in a user namespace" from: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1525998 I decided to disable mounting this filesystems: # systemctl mask dev-hugepages.mount ln...

Hi Marcel thx. for your fast response. I didn't manage to follow up sooner. I had already verbose logging turned on but I don't seem to find the real reason, why the domain controller searchs for a userPrincipalName instead of servicePrincipalName. Because I wasn't sure whether it is the nfs client process or the server process that failed to get the kerberos ticket when I tried the