Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "subtext".
Did you mean:
subtest
2019 Jun 19
5
[RFC] Documentation clarification: Phabricator, not the lists is the main entry point for new patches
The current documentation talks about both the Phabricator review, and review
as mail replies on -commits lists. It also talks about submitting
patches to lists,
with the subtext that it may be friendlier for outsiders.
It is true that Phabricator has some entry threshold, larger than
github, or maillists,
so the attempt is not unwarranted. But from what i can tell, 99.9% patches go
via Phabricator. There is a large chance that such a mail-only patch
will simply be
overloo...
2006 Jan 23
8
In which application areas is R used?
If anyone has a list of application areas where there is
extensive use of R, I'd like to hear of it. My current
short list is:
Bioinformatics
Epidemiology
Geophysics
Agriculture and crop science
John Maindonald
Mathematical Sciences Institute, Australian National University.
john.maindonald at anu.edu.au
2007 May 19
0
database outputting results twice per page (using pagination + sorthelper)
...gt;<a
href="albumview.htm"><%= link_to @title, albums_url(:permalink =>
i.permalink) %></a></h2>
<span id="subbar">[<%= i.genre %>] / released: <%= i.date %></
span><%= i.info %><br>
<span id="subtext"><a href="#">Hype</a> ( +45 ) or <a
href="#">Drop</a> ( -7 ) <span id="subtext"> </span></span> </div></
div><br><br>
<% end %>
Controller
------------------------------
def upcoming
@t...
2019 Jun 19
2
[RFC] Documentation clarification: Phabricator, not the lists is the main entry point for new patches
...9, 2019 at 7:30 AM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
The current documentation talks about both the Phabricator review, and review
as mail replies on -commits lists. It also talks about submitting
patches to lists,
with the subtext that it may be friendlier for outsiders.
It is true that Phabricator has some entry threshold, larger than
github, or maillists,
so the attempt is not unwarranted. But from what i can tell, 99.9% patches go
via Phabricator. There is a large chance that such a mail-only patch
will simply be
overloo...
2004 Jul 07
0
Visualizing Marketing Campaigns With R
...which you can see, along with comments and the raw data set, at
http://r.loyaltymatrix.com. Unfortunately, my display feels clunky and
nonintuitive. Any suggestions? Please feel free to comment or to share any
ideas, either through e-mail or the commenting feature in the blog or on
this list.
As a subtext, I've looked into rmeta, which has a funnelplot function and a
plot for the Mantel-Haenszel test, meta.MH. Neither is quite what I want.
The funnel plot tells me nothing about the relative sizes of the mailing and
control groups; I would like to be able to see it when a control group is
tiny. B...
2006 Nov 28
0
tzinfo_timezone/tzinfo can't modify frozen object
...teError (can''t modify frozen object) on line #29 of
app/views/tickets/my_active_tickets.rhtml:
26: <%=link_to truncate(ticket.description,90,''...''),
ticket_url(ticket), {:title => sanitize(ticket.description)}%>
27: <div class="subtext" style="margin-top:3px;
margin-bottom:14px;">
28: #<%= ticket.id%>
29: | Submitted
<%=format_date(@this_user.tz.utc_to_local(ticket.created_at))%> by <%=
name_or_me(ticket.submitter_id, Proc.new {ticket.submitter.name})%>
30:...
2013 Nov 10
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Goal for 3.5: Library-friendly headers
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 01:42:24PM +0000, Alp Toker wrote:
> |#undef NetBSD||
> ||#undef mips||
> ||#undef sparc||
> ||#undef INT64_MAX||
> ||#undef alloca|
>
> This is not OK to do globally -- even if LLVM doesn't care about the
> definition, maybe embedding applications or OS headers do?
Given that 3 of the 5 #undefs are directly relevant for me -- they exist
2015 May 21
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM IRC channel flooded?
YMMV, but I think when I tried this with buildbot 250 was the largest I could get per build, no matter how many I told it to keep.
Sent from my iPad
> On May 20, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Chris
2013 Nov 10
8
[LLVMdev] Goal for 3.5: Library-friendly headers
With the recent thread on using C++11 in LLVM/clang, one of the
recurring themes was a desire to make the internal headers more consumable.
While I don't personally want any kind of stability guarantee for
internal headers, I do think we can do more to ensure that any given
snapshot of the headers is consumable from different compilers and build
configurations.
In practice this means