search for: subsuming

Hi Rich, I noticed that libguestfs's cfg.mk had an old (and relatively inefficient) version of the rule that checks for empty lines at EOF. The one in maint.mk is much more efficient: >From cf93f04a980ec01ef37db9a0d4c7b99015169eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyering at redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:49:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH libguestfs] maint: remove a

I am trying to removing a load to a TargetGlobalAddress in ISelDagToDag that my backend does not support. The TargetGlobalAddress is assumed to always be of ConstantInt or ConstantFP type, so this transformation is valid. I am correctly able to modify the dag and remove all of the uses of the node as specified in the attached before and after dot images. The nodes in question is the

...lt;snip> > >> All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the >> project, testing, helping out community. > > Well, I used to agree. But when a bug report filed in December goes > untouched entering April, which I don't recall happening prior to RH > subsuming the project, it takes away impetus to ever file one again > from lowly end users like me I think. > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7972 Thanks for drawing my attention to that bug. I encountered it the other day after switching from runlevel 5 to 3 (and back again) on a CentOS 6.6 m...

>> 1. os << format_string("Test"); // writes "test" >> 2. os << format_string("{0}", 7); // writes "7" > > > The "<< format_string(..." is ... really verbose for me. It also makes me > strongly feel like this produces a string rather than a streamable entity. I wonder if we could use UDLs instead? os

On 02/06/2014 08:12 AM, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Please note that it makes a lot of sense to built compiler-rt (and sanitizers) with just-built > Clang. In fact, even though we should support building it with another compilers (gcc, MSVC), > using just-built-Clang should be a default scenario, like it is in configure+make build. This is possible with CMake using the ExternalProject

Hello all. I was wondering if the logLike.nls() and logLike.nlme() functions are still being used. Neither function seems to be available in the most recent release of R (1.9.1). The following is contained in the help file for logLik(): "classes which already have methods for this function include: 'glm', 'lm', 'nls' and 'gls', 'lme' and others in

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Here is a proposal that I mentioned sometime ago. Any thoughts,comments or > suggestions on this proposal would be appreciated. > The proposed solution to this problem to encode Function Notes in the IR. > define void @f() notes("opt-size,pic,noinline") { ... } > Here, the notes include a

>Polyhedral representations are powerful but somewhat expensive to >construct and simple dependence tests don't construct them. Forcing >all dependence test results to go through them would be overkill. >Also, many loop transforms, e.g., loop interchange, don't need the >polyhedral info, just direction vectors. You could instead provide >both direction

It seems the GVNPRE pass has been removed from the main trunk, though it is present in the 2.6 release. From the llvm-commits archive, I found that it was removed  with this checkin: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090928/088214.html "remove the GVNPRE pass. It has been subsumed by the GVN pass." Does the GVN pass optimize all the partial redundancies

Here's an idea for a research project that I thought I'd put out there since probably nobody in my group will have time to follow up on it. It would be interesting to take ideas from this superoptimizer for x86: http://theory.stanford.edu/~aiken/publications/papers/asplos06.pdf http://theory.stanford.edu/~sbansal/superoptimizer.html and adapt them to run on LLVM code. It would

> > Well, I used to agree. But when a bug report filed in December goes > untouched entering April, which I don't recall happening prior to RH > subsuming the project, it takes away impetus to ever file one again from > lowly end users like me I think. It appears that you are the only one to have encountered this bug. Within any project, open source or proprietary; problems are usually prioritized according to the severity of the bug and the num...

Which alias analysis algorithms in opt are worth comparing against (for terms of precision)? I know --anders-aa seems to give me pretty good results. Online [1] it seemed to mention steensgaard's algorithm and some kind of data structure analysis, but neither of these are currently accepted by opt. Is there some way to get them, or are they subsumed by the results of --anders-aa? Thanks,

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 20, 2008, at 8:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > >> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 07:03, Nicolas Capens wrote: >> >>> 1) Does ScalarReplAggregates totally superscede >>> PromoteMemoryToRegister? I >> >> Nope, they are different. Mem2Reg is really important if you

100% with Digimer here. I think there are no conspiracy theories. IMO RedHat does not want nor does it afford to mess up CentOS. All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the project, testing, helping out community. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Digimer" <lists at

If you start a function in one file but don't close it, the package will still build if you manage to close it in a later file. Like so: a.R b.R c.R a.R: function_a <- function(){ print("this is function_a") } b.R: function_b <- function(){ print("unclosed function_b") # no closing } c.R: function_c <- function(){ print("function_c will be part of

Hi, Currently the first stage ("run sanitizer tests in gcc build") of the sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 buildbot is only failing because of: + cd clang_build + make -j16 check-lsan make: *** No rule to make target `check-lsan'. Stop. + echo @@@STEP_FAILURE@@@ @@@STEP_FAILURE@@@ + cd clang_build + make -j16 check-msan make: *** No rule to make target `check-msan'. Stop. + echo

Hello, I do have two different plots from LAD and OLS regression objects like this: # LAD regression and related plot rq(formula = SBP ~ Age) f = coef(rq(SBP ~ Age)) pred = f[1] + f[2]*Age plot (Age, SBP) lines (Age, pred) # OLS regression and related plot Pred = lm(SBP ~ Age) plot (Age, SBP) lines (Age,fitted(Pred)) Well for comparatative reason I would would like to subsume both plots

On May 20, 2008, at 8:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 07:03, Nicolas Capens wrote: > >> 1) Does ScalarReplAggregates totally superscede >> PromoteMemoryToRegister? I > > Nope, they are different. Mem2Reg is really important if you want > register > allocation. Actually SROA does fully subsume Mem2Reg. It iterates between breaking up

Ahh, UDLs also wouldn't permit non literal format strings, which is a deal breaker imo On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:03 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > I'm not sure that would work well. The implementation relies on being able > to index into the parameter pack. How would you do that if each parameter > is streamed in? > > "{0} {1}"_fs(1, 2)

On Mar 30, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > >>> 1) Update LLVM LD/ST instructions to maintain alignment information >> >> Is this referring to the language itself, i.e. the bytecode/ >> assembly format and associated readers/writers? If so this is >> probably the portion that it's