Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "substrpl".
Did you mean:
substr
2013 Oct 09
0
[PATCH 0/1] Porting klibc to arm64
....t:eglob-bad-2
pass ./check.t:eglob-infinite-plus
pass ./check.t:eglob-subst-1
pass ./check.t:eglob-nomatch-1
pass ./check.t:eglob-match-1
pass ./check.t:eglob-case-1
pass ./check.t:eglob-case-2
pass ./check.t:eglob-trim-1
pass ./check.t:eglob-trim-2
pass ./check.t:eglob-trim-3
pass ./check.t:eglob-substrpl-1
pass ./check.t:eglob-substrpl-2
pass ./check.t:eglob-substrpl-3a
pass ./check.t:eglob-substrpl-3b
pass ./check.t:eglob-substrpl-3c
pass ./check.t:eglob-utf8-1
pass ./check.t:glob-bad-1
FAIL ./check.t:glob-bad-2
Description:
Check that symbolic links aren't stat()'d...
2013 Oct 09
2
[PATCH 0/1] Porting klibc to arm64
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de> wrote:
> Anil Singhar dixit:
>
> >Manual testing as provided within the package has been done with all
> >tests passing. This includes the units tests available under
> >usr/klibc/tests, usr/utils, usr/dash and usr/gzip. For dash and
> >gzip, only sanity testing has been done.
>
>