search for: substant

Hello, I am implementing a code transformation that would heavily benefit from the CodeGen/StrongPHIElimination pass, but on the two bytecode files I've tested it on so far llc segfaults on both. I see there have been no substantive changes to this code since the middle of last year. Could someone please tell me what the status of this pass is? Thank you. Marc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100427/a14a0627/attachme...

...(1) is probably more generic, while (2) is more straightforward to > implement. > > Good thing we actually try to finally implement this, > I did not notice > this problem during the review :( Well, it's a nuisance, but the spec is out. It seems to me a new command would be a substantive change so we can't do this in errata. Option (2) would require two statements for drivers and devices, but since it's clearly the case for correct drivers/devices that command does not fail, it follows that this is not a substantive change so it can be fixed in an errata. So the new co...

...(1) is probably more generic, while (2) is more straightforward to > implement. > > Good thing we actually try to finally implement this, > I did not notice > this problem during the review :( Well, it's a nuisance, but the spec is out. It seems to me a new command would be a substantive change so we can't do this in errata. Option (2) would require two statements for drivers and devices, but since it's clearly the case for correct drivers/devices that command does not fail, it follows that this is not a substantive change so it can be fixed in an errata. So the new co...

I have a matrix of similarity scores that I want to convert into a matrix of dissimilarity scores so that I can apply some clustering methods to the data. That is, high values in my matrix signify similarity and low values (zero being the lowest) signify no similarity. What functions/options in R or its packages are available for making this kind of transformation of a matrix?

Actually I was wrong, there *is* one substantive change over v1, which is this: > + /* The client is buggy. The last option must be NBD_OPT_GO or > + * NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME. > + */ > + else { > + nbdkit_error ("client options list didn't finish with NBD_OPT_GO " > + "or NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NA...

I''ve been developing new application on local machine in rails 1.1.1. Hosting provider (godaddy) is at rails 1.0.0 and not upgrading any time soon I''m told. I set "RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''1.0.0''" in my environment.rb file to get past inital errors, but now I''m getting the following error:

...such an argument is used in favour of systemd? :-) >> I should add that the speaker also massively over-simplifies opposition >> to systemd on the basis that he incorrectly perceives it to be >> opposition to change. He seems to ignore the fact that, as above, there >> are substantive objections to the specific architecture and quality of >> systemd, not merely objections to change with no deeper reason. > While there certainly are objective problems with systemd?s design and implementation, it is basic human psychology that many people will not move to a newer syste...

i've been searching the archives but can't find anything substantive on this. most of the music on hold documentation discusses integrating with zap hardware, but i am trying to send it across a sip channel. I have the following in extensions.conf: exten => 2100,1,Answer exten => 2100,2,MusicOnHold(default) and have uncommented the "default"...

...question has between 5-20% missing values (depending on the sample I'm using). Here's my question: Is it acceptable to use a linear-regression based model for imputation of the values of my non-negative discrete predictor variable, even though the aim is to use quantile regression for the substantive analysis? Section 2 (page 6) in Joseph L Schafer's "Multiple Imputation: A primer" (Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1999, Vol 8, pp 3-15) gives me the impression that I might have a problem, if the predictor's distribution is skewed and I'm mainly interested in cond...

Hello! I need to use smbpasswd in scripts. I want to changing smbpassword in script. There is an option -s in smbpasswd so I tried: echo new_password | smbpasswd -s username but without success.... If someone knows how change password - please e-mail..... Best Regards -- Bartlomiej Solarz-Niesluchowski, Administrator WSISiZ e-mail: B.Solarz-Niesluchowski@wsisiz.edu.pl 01-447 Warszawa, ul.

...e and scope of the cooperation, as I could not find anything at the Gnumeric web site on this. Does this suggest that perhaps code sharing and/or some level of validation is taking place on selected Gnumeric math/stat functions? In light of the recent discussions on Excel, this might provide more substantive incentive for those who find themselves needing to use spreadsheets to consider Gnumeric*. Since it is also available under Windows, though not yet Mac OS as far as I can tell, some level of cross platform functionality is available. Thanks, Marc * Not that we particularly want to advocate su...

...ore straightforward to > > implement. > > > > Good thing we actually try to finally implement this, > > > I did not notice > > this problem during the review :( > > Well, it's a nuisance, but the spec is out. > It seems to me a new command would be a substantive change so we can't > do this in errata. > > Option (2) would require two statements for drivers and devices, > but since it's clearly the case for correct drivers/devices > that command does not fail, it follows that this > is not a substantive change so it can be fixe...

I love it in principle. As you get closer to finalizing the syntax, etc. I might have some more detailed comments, but nothing really substantive. Minor API comment as that seems more immediate: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > An example syntax could be: > > // Building an Attribute > > Attributes A; > A.addAlignAttr(4) > .addNoUnwindAttr() > .addStackProte...

...ause they?re just forward-porting old packages with minimal effort. > I should add that the speaker also massively over-simplifies opposition > to systemd on the basis that he incorrectly perceives it to be > opposition to change. He seems to ignore the fact that, as above, there > are substantive objections to the specific architecture and quality of > systemd, not merely objections to change with no deeper reason. While there certainly are objective problems with systemd?s design and implementation, it is basic human psychology that many people will not move to a newer system despit...

Thanks to Luke Tierney, Agustin Lobo, Stephen Eglen, A.J. Rossini, Simon Wood and Timothy H. Keitt for responding to my question about poor man's parallel processing. Much of the substantive material was cc'ed to r-help already, but my take is as follows. 1) Currently, there is nothing "simple" for solving my problem. 2) I thought that Timothy Keitt's description of the use of a relational database for keeping track of different runs was quite interesting. 3)...

This is a more general statiscal question, not specific to R: As I move through my masters curriculum in statistics, I am becoming more and more attuned to issues of model fit and diagnostics (graphical methods, AIC, BIC, deviance, etc.) As my regression professor always likes to say, only draw substantive conclusions from valid models. Yet in published articles in my field (medicine), I rarely see any explicit description of whether, and if so how, model fit was assessed and assumptions checked. Mostly the results sections are all about hypothesis testing on model coefficients. Is this commo...

Can we get back to the substantive discussion about your ideas for lessening the technical debt? On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:05 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > Well, differences of opinion is what makes horse races. > > Reed > > > On 06/04/2012 04:57 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> >>...

Hi all, Using: R version 2.8.1 Patched (2009-03-07 r48068) on OSX (10.5.6) with survival version: Version: 2.35-3 Date: 2009-02-10 I get the following using the first example in ?summary.survfit: > summary( survfit( Surv(futime, fustat)~1, data=ovarian)) Call: survfit(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ 1, data = ovarian) time n.risk n.event survival

I'm having an issue with workstation opening pdf's with firefox. I have the adobe plugin installed and enabled in firefox but firefox will only let me save the file. Under applications I have tried using the doc reader and adobe to associate pdf's with firefox with no luck. I am running firefox 3.0.4. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you -- Bo Lynch

set FEATURES_OK as per virtio 1.0 spec Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 2 ++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h index f3fe33a..a6d0cde 100644 ---