search for: subsidized

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:39 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Good points David, I don't feel qualified to evaluate the differences > >> between those versions though... Perhaps Richard or Doug could comment > here? > > > > Unless

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> Good points David, I don't feel qualified to evaluate the differences >> between those versions though... Perhaps Richard or Doug could comment here? > > Unless I'm misreading the buildbots, we don't actually have anything > trying to build with MSVC. Have we considered how

Hello all, Using the Apache Wiki [1] I summed up what can be used simultaneously by gcc, MSVC and clang. I mostly considered only the latest versions of the proposals where there were several, where not there is a link to a note at the bottom. Furthermore I did not scourge through 3 bug databases and I implicitly trusted the wiki page. I drew up a list of profiles, listing the base

im using the most recent version of ubuntu and i wanted to run WOW but i have been unable to even configure it due to a lack of text on the configure screen. when i change tabs there is a sudden flash of jumbled texts that immediately subsides. and i am using nvdia drivers for my graphics card. here is what it looks like (title bar got cut off) [Image:

I have what should be a no-brainer setup: Windows network using AD with a single Linux box. I need to provide access to a single directory on the linux box to anyone from the network. Security is not a concern. So... On the linux box, I created a user xxxxx. I added this user to the local samba database using smbpasswd -a. I added the linux box to the Windows workgroup and told it where to

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 20:08, Eli Bendersky wrote: > >>>> I suppose this tradeoff can be evaluated by looking at the delta >>>> between 4.5 and 4.6 which is actually supported by MSVC 2010 and Clang >>>> 3.1 >>> >>> Makes perfect sense to

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Matthieu M. <matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Using the Apache Wiki [1] I summed up what can be used simultaneously by gcc, > MSVC and clang. > > I mostly considered only the latest versions of the proposals where there were > several, where not there is a link to a note at the bottom. Furthermore I did > not

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Matthieu M. <matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Using the Apache Wiki [1] I summed up what can be used simultaneously by gcc, >> MSVC and clang. >> >> I mostly considered only the latest versions of the proposals

...lla.org/thunderbird/ -------------------- Practically what this means is that in 2016, Thunderbird will finally be able to accept donations from users directed toward the update and maintenance of Thunderbird. In the long run, Thunderbird needs to rely on our users for support, and not expect to be subsidized by revenue from Firefox. We welcome this help from the Mozilla Foundation in moving toward our goal of developing independent sources of income for Thunderbird. In the technical part of that post, Mitchell reiterated that Mozilla needs to be laser-focused on Firefox, and that the burden this place...

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:00 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Matthieu M. <matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> > >> Using the Apache Wiki [1] I summed up what can be used

...y intelligent thoughts here? I know the price point puts it above most users Asterisk outlay (I run mine on a $100 P3 -800) But interesting to see what happens if people start running video conferencing etc on their home asterisk servers, and lets face it where else can you buy this kind of subsidized processing power from at that price. Cheers, Dean -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050516/2b10b6e0/attachment.htm

...-------------------- > Practically what this means is that in 2016, Thunderbird will finally > be able to accept donations from users directed toward the update and > maintenance of Thunderbird. In the long run, Thunderbird needs to > rely on our users for support, and not expect to be subsidized by > revenue from Firefox. We welcome this help from the Mozilla > Foundation in moving toward our goal of developing independent > sources of income for Thunderbird. The interesting thing is that Thunderbird has seen a lot more bug fixes and improvements since Mozilla 'abandoned'...

> > <with Prof. Farnsworth voice> "Good News, everyone". > > I've just kicked off project "Sphinx". Which is supposed to > sound like "Speex" merged with "INT". ;) Meaning I am working > on an integer encoder and decoder. > Great. I looked into converting speex to fixed point a while ago, but my job has gotten much busier

If you have access to a Windows box, Winamp v5.1 can rip CD's to AAC+. I can't imagine why you would want to do that normally, but it would be useful for comparisons. Ross. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Heyes" <karl@xiph.org> To: "Ross Levis" <ross@stationplaylist.com> Cc: "icecast" <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Thursday, September

Windows 98 is totally obsolete and useless. WindowsXP is a completely different architecture for just about everything except the name Windows. You owe it to yourself to check out WindowsXP, even though it is subsidized by the "eveil empire." :) -g. At 16:00 2005-09-07, Karl Heyes wrote: >On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 23:33, Ross Levis wrote: > > If you have access to a Windows box, Winamp v5.1 can rip CD's to AAC+. > > I can't imagine why you would want to do that normally, but it woul...

I have a lot of folks asking me about an auto-negotiating WLAN phone supposedly being brought to market by Hop-On, which is touted to carry an MSRP of $40 Press photos (stock art) of the device shows it looks almost identical to devices from Zyxel and UTStarCom. I am trying to explain to folks there is no way in hell you are going to be able to buy these phones, hardware only, for $40

Appears to be unresponsive. Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

> you can already do all this outside of icecast (my DoSomething winamp > plugin was specifically written for things like that), so I'm not entirely > sure I see the benefit in sending the data to icecast. Well, it could be used to provide cheaper hosting by subsidizing the bandwidth costs with CD sales, all controlled by the host and not the broadcaster. This would require an

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 15:44 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > What about partition <-> partition virtio such as what we could do on > > PAPR systems. That would have the weak barrier bit. > > > > Is it partition <-> partition, bypassing IOMMU? No. > I think I'd settle for just something that doesn't regress > non-experimental setups that

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 15:44 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > What about partition <-> partition virtio such as what we could do on > > PAPR systems. That would have the weak barrier bit. > > > > Is it partition <-> partition, bypassing IOMMU? No. > I think I'd settle for just something that doesn't regress > non-experimental setups that