Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "subsequnet".
Did you mean:
subsequent
2016 Feb 25
1
Possible soundness issue with available_externally (split from "RFC: Add guard intrinsics")
...This would
in turn allow, for example, continuing to get full deduction for private
inline methods inside of class bodies whose callers were all also inline
and inside the class body.
We could probably also do some tricks where we actually expand comdats
themselves in order to enable deduction and subsequnet optimizations,
although that might need a cost model.
-Chandler
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:29 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> Yea, I'm pretty sad about all of this. I'm also not seeing a lot of
> awesome paths forward.
>
> Here is the least bad str...
2016 Feb 25
0
Possible soundness issue with available_externally (split from "RFC: Add guard intrinsics")
Yea, I'm pretty sad about all of this. I'm also not seeing a lot of awesome
paths forward.
Here is the least bad strategy I can come up with. Curious if folks think
this is sufficient:
1) Stop deducing function attributes within comdats by examining the bodies
of the functions (so that we remain free to transform the bodies of
functions).
2) Teach frontends to emit (even at O0!!!)
2016 Feb 25
3
Possible soundness issue with available_externally (split from "RFC: Add guard intrinsics")
On 02/24/2016 08:10 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev wrote:
>> On 2016-Feb-24, at 19:46, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:34 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
>>> <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: