search for: subroutinetyp

We still have access to types via MDNodes directly and the assertion that assumes all accesses to DITypes are accessing the resolved DIType will fire i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. If all elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray and use that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we currently have unspecified parameter in the type array and it is not a DIType. What are your thoughts? Suggestions are welcome. Is it a good idea to canonic...

...pes are accessing the resolved DIType >> >> >> will >> >> >> fire >> >> >> >> >> >> i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) >> >> >> >> >> >> One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. >> >> >> If >> >> >> all >> >> >> elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray >> >> >> and >> >> >> use >> >> >> that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But...

...;> >> We still have access to types via MDNodes directly and the assertion that >> assumes all accesses to DITypes are accessing the resolved DIType will fire >> >> i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) >> >> One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. If all >> elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray and use >> that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we currently have >> unspecified parameter in the type array and it is not a DIType. > > > I am going to work on a patch that ad...

...on >> >> that >> >> assumes all accesses to DITypes are accessing the resolved DIType will >> >> fire >> >> >> >> i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef())) >> >> >> >> One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. If >> >> all >> >> elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray and >> >> use >> >> that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we currently have >> >> unspecified parameter in the type array and it is not...