search for: subordinate

Is there a difference between I(x*y) and I(y*x) ? I have a call to lmer that results in this complaint: Error in is.alpha2.subordinate * ~z.min.co.res : non-numeric argument to binary operator when I change this line: I(is.alpha2.subordinate*z.min.co.res)+ to this: I(z.min.co.res*is.alpha2.subordinate)+ the complaint goes away. I'd like to understand why.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I have had a problem detecting the network card on my notebook when ACPI is enabled for a year. The problem still exists in 7.1-RELEASE. with ACPI: ... bge0: <Broadcom NetLink Gigabit Ethernet Controller, ASIC rev. 0xb002> irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci8 bge0: 0x10000 bytes of rid 0x10 res 3 failed (0, 0xffffffff). bge0: couldn't

...add_devices(struct pci_bus *bus) retval = pci_bus_add_device(dev); if (retval) dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error adding device, continuing\n"); - } - - list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { - BUG_ON(!dev->is_added); /* * If there is an unattached subordinate bus, attach * it and then scan for unattached PCI devices. */ - if (dev->subordinate) { - if (list_empty(&dev->subordinate->node)) { - down_write(&pci_bus_sem); - list_add_tail(&dev->subordinate->node, - &dev->bus->c...

...add_devices(struct pci_bus *bus) retval = pci_bus_add_device(dev); if (retval) dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error adding device, continuing\n"); - } - - list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { - BUG_ON(!dev->is_added); /* * If there is an unattached subordinate bus, attach * it and then scan for unattached PCI devices. */ - if (dev->subordinate) { - if (list_empty(&dev->subordinate->node)) { - down_write(&pci_bus_sem); - list_add_tail(&dev->subordinate->node, - &dev->bus->c...

...add_devices(struct pci_bus *bus) retval = pci_bus_add_device(dev); if (retval) dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error adding device, continuing\n"); - } - - list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { - BUG_ON(!dev->is_added); /* * If there is an unattached subordinate bus, attach * it and then scan for unattached PCI devices. */ - if (dev->subordinate) { - if (list_empty(&dev->subordinate->node)) { - down_write(&pci_bus_sem); - list_add_tail(&dev->subordinate->node, - &dev->bus->c...

...n migrating to Samba on FreeBSD from Win(yuck)NT, I?ve run into this hitch. Let us say I have 9 users named User1, User2, User3, ? User9 User1 is a member of group wheel User2 & User3 have the administrative task (add/change/delete) of managing the content of the directory Dirc1 and all subordinate objects (files and directories). Dirc1 is the directory /usr/Shared/Dirc1. Only User1 will need to delete Dirc1, but if it helps then User2 & User3 can also delete Dirc1. All users can read anything in Dirc1 and all subordinate objects as well. All users can contribute (add/change/delete) an...

...ggestions. > > For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out where the changes are > needed - based on my earlier work with the originally proposed terminology. > Now that we know where to change it, should not be too great a hassle to > replace again by some other choice... subordinate was a bit too long to > type :) > > To make the election of team choice more simple, I have prepared my first > SurveyMonkey poll here - it should be possible to choose one response for > each of the two roles (although if you really can't pick one of several > names you like,...

...ggestions. > > For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out where the changes are > needed - based on my earlier work with the originally proposed terminology. > Now that we know where to change it, should not be too great a hassle to > replace again by some other choice... subordinate was a bit too long to > type :) > > To make the election of team choice more simple, I have prepared my first > SurveyMonkey poll here - it should be possible to choose one response for > each of the two roles (although if you really can't pick one of several > names you like,...

...ystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8383 Flags: fast devsel Capabilities: [40] #00 [0000] 00:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Core Processor PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev 11) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 0000a000-0000afff Memory behind bridge: f4000000-f79fffff Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000d0000000-00000000dfffffff Capabilities: [40] Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8383 Capabilities: [60] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/2 Mask...

...nks again for all the suggestions. For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out where the changes are needed - based on my earlier work with the originally proposed terminology. Now that we know where to change it, should not be too great a hassle to replace again by some other choice... subordinate was a bit too long to type :) To make the election of team choice more simple, I have prepared my first SurveyMonkey poll here - it should be possible to choose one response for each of the two roles (although if you really can't pick one of several names you like, you should be able to take t...

...nks again for all the suggestions. For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out where the changes are needed - based on my earlier work with the originally proposed terminology. Now that we know where to change it, should not be too great a hassle to replace again by some other choice... subordinate was a bit too long to type :) To make the election of team choice more simple, I have prepared my first SurveyMonkey poll here - it should be possible to choose one response for each of the two roles (although if you really can't pick one of several names you like, you should be able to take t...

...upts: 64bit- Queue=0/1 Enable- Capabilities: [6c] Express Root Port (Slot-) IRQ 0 00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5000 Series Chipset PCI Express x8 Port 2-3 (rev b1) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=05, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: 00002000-00003fff Memory behind bridge: c8100000-c87fffff Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/1 Enable- Capabilities: [6c] Express Root Port (Slot-)...

Dear R-users, I'm trying to model some data using a tweedie GLM approach. My response variable is the number of pupae that are the offspring of a subordinate wasp on a wasp's nest. However, they're not count data- for each nest, I only know the mean number of pupae per subordinate, which is continous. The data also contain a high proportion of zeros. I'm not very experienced at statistical modelling, but from reading previous posts, it seem...

...ilities: [44] Debug port > Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2 > > 00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP67 PCI Bridge (rev a2) (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode]) > Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 > Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=64 > I/O behind bridge: 0000e000-0000efff > Memory behind bridge: feb00000-febfffff > Capabilities: [b8] #0d [0000] > Capabilities: [8c] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping > > 00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP67 AHCI Controller...

With a has_one/belongs_to relationship, what''s the best way to guarantee that the belongs_to object gets created and is accessible alongside the has_one object? I *think* the after_create callback is a good choice, but I discovered an oddity while trying it. F''rinstance, if every horse has a carriage: ============ ActiveRecord::Schema.define do create_table(:horses) {|t|

..., latency 0 > I/O ports at ffa0 [size=16] > Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2 > > 00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP67 PCI Bridge (rev a2) (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode]) > Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 > Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=64 > I/O behind bridge: 0000e000-0000efff > Memory behind bridge: feb00000-febfffff > Capabilities: [b8] #0d [0000] > Capabilities: [8c] HyperTransport: MSI Mapping > > 00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP67 AHCI Controller (rev a2) (prog-if 85 [Maste...

...ernet address: 18:03:73:fd:9e:37 pcib2: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> irq 53 at device 1.1 on pci0 pcib0: allocated type 3 (0xd8800000-0xd8ffffff) for rid 20 of pcib2 pcib0: allocated type 3 (0xd5100000-0xd51fffff) for rid 24 of pcib2 pcib2: domain 0 pcib2: secondary bus 1 pcib2: subordinate bus 1 pcib2: memory decode 0xd8800000-0xd8ffffff pcib2: prefetched decode 0xd5100000-0xd51fffff pci1: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib2 pci1: domain=0, physical bus=1 found-> vendor=0x14e4, dev=0x165f, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=1, slot=0, func=0 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00,...

I am trying to graphically represent a large set of data who's result is not strictly uniform. http://n4.nabble.com/file/n961629/egraph_rules_list_2.png The scatter plot to the left has all of the data rising in steps however I know that there are cases within my data that do not fit the dotted line. temp<-edat[edat$R1SC>0,,]

...ggestions. > > For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out where the changes are > needed - based on my earlier work with the originally proposed terminology. > Now that we know where to change it, should not be too great a hassle to > replace again by some other choice... subordinate was a bit too long to > type :) > > To make the election of team choice more simple, I have prepared my first > SurveyMonkey poll here - it should be possible to choose one response for > each of the two roles (although if you really can't pick one of several > names you like,...

...quent text from the including file is wrong. In some cases it actually pulls from above the INCLUDE leading to the INCLUDE being reprocessed (an infinite recursion). (The recursion seems to stop after 20-30 pulls, so I guess there's some sort of depth limit.) I was able to proceed by using a subordinate call to menu, so this isn't a problem for me now, but thought you might want to know. Mike