search for: subfs

Hi all, I'm hoping someone could tell me what best practices are as far as keeping programs organized in R. In most languages, I like to keep things organized by writing small functions. So, suppose I want to write a function that would require helper functions or would just be too big to write in one piece. Below are three ways to do this: ################### Style 1 (C-style)

I've "group" namespace and b2b mailbox under it. I'm unable to subscribe to it and deliver emails there. Here is my problem: if I create subfolder (lets name it "subf") under b2b mailbox I'm unable to subscribe to it until acl plugin is enabled. Even if I put dovecot-acl file in .b2b.subf folder with anyone full rights dovecot-acl-list doesn't get populated

Hi I am trying to modify the llc in that way: subf 3, 5, 3 subf 3, 5, 3 stw 3, 44(1) stw 3, 44(1) # InlineAsm Start --> isync

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to modify the llc in that way: > > > >         subf 3, 5, 3                                 subf 3, 5, 3 > >         stw 3, 44(1)                                stw 3, 44(1) > >                                                                # InlineAsm

...drom e:: -> /dev/cdrom What does the entry with the two colons (::) tell Wine? 2) Is there a particular reason that certain drive letters are used? Have their been any standards setup as to what gets mapped where in Wine? 3) I'm using SuSE 10.0 with most of my non-system mounts using subfs and the CD drives are told in the subfs options that they are going to be cdfss. This (or one of the subfs options, I'm not sure which) causes a problem in that when e disk is placed in the CD drive, it creates a new directory with the name of the CD volume and mounts it there. This preve...

?s 23:06 de 25/07/2023, Bob Green escreveu: > Hello, > > I am seeking advice as to how I can download the 833 files from this > site:"http://home.brisnet.org.au/~bgreen/Data/" > > I want to be able to download them to perform a textual analysis. > > If the 833 files, which are in a Directory with two subfolders were on > my computer I could read them

Here''s the latest USB code against the xen 3.0.0 release. Since the last posting this version updates the code to use the new 32 bit grant references and the latest GNTTABOP_map_grant_ref definition. I''ve also changed the definition of the virtual USB HCD to have a single port rather than seven ports with six unused. Domains importing multiple USB devices will get a HCD for

Ok :-) und how can I add inlined assembly to the output? - Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Bill Wendling Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 19:16 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List Betreff: Re: [LLVMdev] modifying llc asm output On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Michael Graumann<MichaelGraumann

...tr 1 2 /dev/hdd1 /sql ext3 acl,user_xattr 1 2 /dev/hda5 swap swap pri=42 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts mode=0620,gid=5 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs noauto 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs noauto 0 0 /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom subfs fs=cdfss,ro,procuid,nosuid,nodev,exec,iocharset=utf8 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/floppy subfs fs=floppyfss,procuid,nodev,nosuid,sync 0 0 ################################################# # Samba mount points # ################################################# 196.16...

...maximum = 12 months or whole year deficit). Even though I "jitter"-ed the minimum or maximum FD value only (eg. FD=0+1e-6 or FD=12-1e-6), nothing changed to the result. The formula I used is like this: -------------------------------------------------------------- glm(FD ~ Fsize, data = subFS) -- Coefficients: (Intercept) Fsize 7.7913 -0.3092 Degrees of Freedom: 29 Total (i.e. Null); 28 Residual Null Deviance: 463 Residual Deviance: 425.5 AIC: 170.7 -------------------------------------------------------------- I appreciate for any clarification. Best wi...

Hi, I was hoping you could provide me with some pointers on how to get started adding some features to dovecot. What I am trying to do is add an optional publish mechanism, that would publish a list of events as they occur, so that an external program could read these events and do "something". These events would be "Add", "Delete", "Move" - these

Dear guys, I am having problem to split edges correctly. Mostly because the new basic blocks are creating infinite loops. Could someone help me fixing the code below? It is creating assembly like this one below. Block LBB1_9 was inserted to break the critical edge between blocks LBB1_3 and LBB1_8. But it changes the semantics of the original program, because, before, LBB1_8 was falling

Sadly the latest optimization broke completely everything. The asm code isn't gas compliant. the libFLAC linker script has a typo, disabling the asm optimization and/or altivec won't let a correct build anyway. Instant fixes for the asm stuff: sed -i -e"s:;:\#:" on the lpc_asm.s to load address instead of addis+ori you could use lis and la and PLEASE use the @l(register)

...(z=10; z<20; z++) s += ((((t*z-u)*z-v)*z-w)*z-x)*z-y; // loopbody2 } Now, the assembly that is produced has 21 loads, which indicates no effort to reuse any data. In particular, the two basic blocks that correspond to loopbody1 and to loopbody2 are identical (except that the adds become subfs). Being identical, both of these generated basic blocks have 8 loads in their first 11 instructions. These 8 loads will fetch the eight variables. But, of course, by the time loopbody2 is reached, some of these variables are already in registers and so they did not need to be reloaded. Moreover, th...

The problem is that you are inserting block 9 in the wrong spot. mf.getLastBlock() returns the block with the greatest number which may have nothing to do with the ordering. Why not use the end iterator (mf.end) to insert? -Tanya On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > > Dear guys, > > I am having problem to split edges correctly. Mostly because the new

> > Okay, I changed the C backend to emit syntactic loops around the real > loops, and it seems to make a big difference. LLVM now generates this > code (note that the actual loop is not actually responsible for control > flow, it's unreachable): > > ... which is exactly what we want. Patrick, I would appreciate it if > you > could rerun your tests on PPC and let

I've had this a long time but haven't submitted it yet. I've tried to mirror the ia32 setup, so there should be a new subdirectory src/libFLAC/ppc . The first two attachments go there. The third is a context diff for src/libFLAC/Makefile.am . I have some more modified files, which I figured I'd submit after the above are checked in and working for somebody other than me. If you

> If you don't want critical edges in the machine code CFG, you're going to > have to write a machine code CFG critical edge splitting pass: LLVM > doesn't currently have one. > > -Chris Hey guys, I've coded a pass to break the critical edges of the machine control flow graph. The program works fine, but I am sure it is not the right way of implementing it.

On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > However, it does not remove all the critical edges. I am getting a very > weird dataflow graph (even without the Break Critical edges pass). The > dataflow generated by MachineFunction::dump() for the program below is > given here: > http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/fernando/projects/soc/images/loop_no_crit2.pdf ... > The

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I suspect that a large reason that LLVM does worst than a native C > > compiler with the CBE+GCC is that LLVM generates very low-level C code, > > and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without > > syntactic loops). > > Yup, this is EXACTLY what is