search for: subconsciously

...at Peter Dalgaard has previously posted to R-help for improving graphic quality. I had to change the margins a bit, but here is what it looks like: http://www.broad.mit.edu/~finnyk/Rhome.jpg Personally, I think it looks much better. Because people so often "judge a book by its cover" (subconsciously or consciously), I'm wondering if anyone thinks this is worthy of replacing the current version? I want R to maximize R's appeal and albeit a small improvement, hopefully this change will help a bit! Regards, Finny Kuruvilla -- Finny Kuruvilla, MD, PhD Department of Molecular Biology, M...

I have a very simple form that looks allows an input for an error code and then give the show page from the scaffolding if the error code is in the database and a notification on the list page, again from the scaffolding if not. Here''s the form: find.rhtml <h1>Find error</h1> <%= start_form_tag :action => ''search''%> <p><label

...process .. (ie .. > do this, test, do that, test .. rinse, repeat). > > But with where we are right now .. I don't think it will take more than > one more month to finish and test. ... I wonder if the use of "irritative" instead of "iterative" was intentional, subconsciously or not. :)) Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie jon at jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C)

On 14-11-26 05:49 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 26/11/2014, 1:45 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote: >> Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run by >> default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the Internet. >> If I wrap them in try() then they can be skipped if the Internet is not >> available, but may not be tested in cases when I

Just for whoever it maintaining the "Getting Started" instructions at http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html : The page is missing a link to the download section. Returning to the main page at http://llvm.org/ , I found the Site Map, checked it - and didn't see the download link (well, it's sitting right below, but there's so much text on that page that I simply overlooked

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 26.02.2008, 14:01 -0800 schrieb Tanya M. Lattner: > I can move the llvm-gcc4.2 source code up in the list if people think this > is better... but the binaries will still be first and should be. Just make it consistent so people who don't know their way around yet can quickly find what they're looking for. I agree that binaries should be first if they should

Am 05.05.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > Having a code of conduct like this is just as bad as having no code > of conduct at all. It trivializes the importance of a code of conduct > and its pretty much impossible to enforce. Regardless of what kind CoC you have: if it comes to having to enforce it, the community has stopped being open and welcoming. So I think this approach is

> The page is missing a link to the download section. Returning to the > main page at http://llvm.org/ , I found the Site Map, checked it - and > didn't see the download link (well, it's sitting right below, but > there's so much text on that page that I simply overlooked it). You are right that its missing from the getting started guide. I'll add it. > The

> I plan to run the test suite, just to establish a known baseline (this > is an amd64 machine, and things tend to be a bit less well-polished than > on stock x86 installations). > Does it make sense to > * first run the test suite with the binaries, > * compile llvm-gcc from sources, > * run the test suite again with the recompiled binaries? What do you plan to use this

Test First Development is great...But should you use it when you are adding classes/methods on to external library that doesn''t have an extensive test suite? I noticed that the rspec plugin for autotest has no specs. David Chemlinsky said something to the list a while back that has been stewing in my subconscious - that you develop software differently using Test First

Hi! I made a subliminals-script for compiz. It simply uses an existing plugin to flash text on the screen, much in the same way movie theaters did in the 70s to sell more popcorn. Only it is used by the user for a particular purpose. Use cases: * Jim wants something that's new for him and would like to grow more comfortable with it in a convenient way before he starts taking action

Hello, in the tunk, i found a new style for spec: describe Foo do it "should do bar" do ... end end instead of context "Foo" context "should do bar" ... end end The Rails-Textmate-bundle in trunk use only the new "describe-it" style, What are the reasons for the new style ? Shall i use the new style from now on ? Hussein

As a suggestion, what about having "Common Uses for LLVM" that list out what the LLVM n00b needs if he wants to... (*) Get hello.c to compile and run in LLVM bitcode (This is the "what's the absolute minimum I need to do to see this thing in action?" question.) (*) Use LLVM as a back-end for a custom language or interpreter (This is the "OK now that I've seen the

On 30/12/14 22:07, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I have that vague feeling that what I'm about to say will probably be > declared wrong... Still. From the very beginning I do not consider SELinux > adding to the security of the system. How can it if it can be turned off > on the fly? On the other hand, it adds hundreds of thousands of lines to > kernel code which does exactly

Howdy All, I'm considering Asterisk / Digium as a replacement to my existing phone switch. I need to continue to be able to push analog lines between multiple buildings in a campus environment. The Digium Analog 410 Card manual states it's not recommended to go beyond 1500 feet distance for an FXS card, and no line should leave the building or be bundled. The 2400 Series Manual does

Good afternoon from Singapore, May I know roughly how many more months before CentOS 8.0 will be released? https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 Thank you very much. -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link:

...?id=YUgNBwNQGAFbVR1QWlQKVF0F> " on ... The same technology that could replace addiction with "an end to schizophrenia and to depression and to ..." that same thing could equally be used to create a mindless army of slaves that believe they're voting (would you believe, voting subconsciously? maybe a Universe built on the "will to power me" or on ... the "power of the law of attractiveness") anyway, I've talked a little about what I see as a near absolute eventuality ... a system that includes what I call "limited omniscience" which is ... plugging Ale...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1530 Summary: ssh-copy-id: strip colon from end of hostname Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: Other URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=22617 2 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Ted Neward wrote: > As a suggestion, what about having "Common Uses for LLVM" that list out what > the LLVM n00b needs if he wants to... > > (*) Get hello.c to compile and run in LLVM bitcode (This is the "what's the > absolute minimum I need to do to see this thing in action?" question.) > (*) Use LLVM as a back-end for a custom

Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run by default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the Internet. If I wrap them in try() then they can be skipped if the Internet is not available, but may not be tested in cases when I would like to know about the failure. (Not to mention that the example syntax is ugly.) If I mark them \dontrun or \donttest