Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "subclas".
Did you mean:
  subclass
  
2014 Jan 06
3
[LLVMdev] Why do X86_32TargetMachine and X86_64TargetMachine classes exist?
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 14:23 -0800, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> AFAIK, the answer is basically “because it’s always been that way.” I
> seem to recall there were some things that were different (data layout
> string and such), but that could also be parameterized if it hasn’t
> been already by the recent refactorings, I suppose.
It is *all* now parameterized. The classes
2006 Mar 10
0
WEBrick crashing
...0.00        2     0.00     0.00  Array#empty?
   0.00     6.55      0.00        1     0.00  2750.00 
DRb::DRbServer#stop_servic
e
   0.00     6.55      0.00        1     0.00     0.00  Kernel.nil?
   0.00     6.55      0.00        1     0.00     0.00 
CGI::Session::ActiveRecord
Store::Session#subclasses
   0.00     6.55      0.00        1     0.00     0.00 
Dependencies.rails_officia
l_require_or_load
   0.00     6.55      0.00        1     0.00     0.00 
DRb::DRbServer#main_loop
   0.00     6.55      0.00        4     0.00     0.00  Hash#default
   0.00     6.55      0.00        1     0.00...