Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "subcase".
2020 Jun 18
2
How to know the CallInst is a virtual call ?
...e virtual function
> calls (using the existing IR - not accounting for some special cases
> that might involve adding extra metadata, etc) should be framed in
> terms of indirect calls in general (perhaps indirect calls from
> functions in constant arrays - maybe that's the specific subcase you
> want to target, etc).
>
> - Dave
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200619/94a4a6eb/attachment.html>
2020 Jun 18
2
How to know the CallInst is a virtual call ?
Hi
I know that a virtual call looks like this :
%4 = load %class.base*, %class.base** %1, align 8
%5 = bitcast %class.base* %4 to void (%class.base*)***
%6 = load void (%class.base*)**, void (%class.base*)*** %5, align 8
%7 = getelementptr inbounds void (%class.base*)*, void (%class.base*)**
%6, i64 0
%8 = load void (%class.base*)*, void (%class.base*)** %7, align 8
call void
2009 Aug 31
4
Offtopic, HT vs. HH in coin flips
Dear R-help,
Could someone please try to explain this paradox to me? What is more likely to show up first in a string of coin tosses, "Heads then Tails", or "Heads then Heads"?
##generate 2500 strings of random coin flips
ht <- replicate(2500,
paste(sample(c("H", "T"), 100, replace = TRUE),
collapse =
2004 Dec 11
3
rsync to retry if copy failed - possible?
Hello,
I want to be 100% sure that rsync copies something from one location to
another.
However, I did not see an option which would make rsync retry an
operation if it failed for whatever reason (network was down when rsync
started, or network went down during rsync was copying something,
connection timed out etc.).
For example, wget has an option like --tries=number Set number of
retries
2011 Jun 30
5
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ?
Hi Jay,
> As I understand it, PATypeHolder, OpaqueType and the Module's
> TypeSymbolTable are gone. Instead, StructTypes can optionally be
> named, and if they are then:
>
> - they use name equivalence instead of structural equivalence.
> - you can create them without any fields, and then add the fields
> later when the struct is complete.
I find this distinction between