Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "subcall".
Did you mean:
sibcall
2004 Jul 16
3
interpreting profiling output
...profiling. I have
read the help pages Rprof, summaryRprof and consult the R extensions
manual, but I still have problems understanding the output.
Basically the output consist of self.time and total.time. I have the
understanding that total.time is the time spent in a given function
including any subcalls or child functions or whatever the technical
term for that activity is. In contrasts self.time is the time spent in
the function excluding subcalls.
Now, in my understanding basically everything in R is functions. I
would then guess that for almost any function (except the "atomic
ones"...
2016 Dec 18
1
[PATCH] appliance: Disable EDD (edd=off) (RHBZ#1404287).
EDD (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_Disk_Drive) is a BIOS INT 13h
subcall for communicating the extended size of the boot disk over 8GB
to the OS. Since libguestfs doesn't use a boot disk, and the
appliance disk is limited to 4GB, and we use virtio-scsi, this is all
useless.
EDD is also broken currently on RHEL 7.3, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=...
2019 Oct 05
4
should base R have a piping operator ?
Hi John,
Thanks, but the Bizzaro pipe comes with many flaws though :
* It's not a single operator
* It has a different precedence
* It cannot be used in a subcall
* The variable assigned to must be on the right
* It doesn't trigger indentation when going to the line
* It creates/overwrite a `.` variable in the worksace.
And it doesn't deal gracefully with some lazy evaluation edge cases such as
:
compose <- function(f, g) { function(x) g(f(x)) }...
2004 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
...rs and memory? :P
Our mid-term plans include looking at multithreading/parallel processing
kinds of things, at least for shared memory systems. At the LLVM level,
we are interested in _exposing_ parallelism. In the fib example you are
using, for example, it is pretty easy to show that all of the subcalls to
fib can be run independently of each other (ie, in parallel). Combined
with a suitable runtime library (e.g., pthreads), you could imagine an
LLVM transformation that allows it to run well on a machine with 10K
processors. :)
> Actually, maybe the problem is that scince is not ready arroun...
2019 Oct 05
0
should base R have a piping operator ?
...//stackoverflow.com/a/52465956/8245406
Hope this helps,
Rui Barradas
?s 16:48 de 05/10/19, Ant F escreveu:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks, but the Bizzaro pipe comes with many flaws though :
> * It's not a single operator
> * It has a different precedence
> * It cannot be used in a subcall
> * The variable assigned to must be on the right
> * It doesn't trigger indentation when going to the line
> * It creates/overwrite a `.` variable in the worksace.
>
> And it doesn't deal gracefully with some lazy evaluation edge cases such as
> :
>
> compose <...
2004 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
...interested in _exposing_ parallelism.
hm... strange. You mean, you going to define explicitly what and how to
parallelize? Why then we don't need similar unpleasant things for
registers?..
CL> In the fib example you are
CL> using, for example, it is pretty easy to show that all of the subcalls to
CL> fib can be run independently of each other (ie, in parallel). Combined
CL> with a suitable runtime library (e.g., pthreads), you could imagine an
CL> LLVM transformation that allows it to run well on a machine with 10K
CL> processors. :)
Chris, that's clear. But (let's...
2004 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
> I see more precisely what you mean, but I don't think it is that
> straightforward to generalise the benefits multiple CPU on single host
> programming to multiple CPU at multiple hosts. I don't think that both
> cases involve the same techniques.
you are right, just think of shared memory.
> For example, in "single host" configuration you get a very low
2004 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hello again Valery,
Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
> All benefits, what one could obtain from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU
> at single host", one might obtaine from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU
> at multiple hosts". Isn't that logical?
I see more precisely what you mean, but I don't think it is that
straightforward to generalise the benefits multiple CPU on
2019 Oct 05
6
should base R have a piping operator ?
Dear R-devel,
The most popular piping operator sits in the package `magrittr` and is used
by a huge amount of users, and imported /reexported by more and more
packages too.
Many workflows don't even make much sense without pipes nowadays, so the
examples in the doc will use pipes, as do the README, vignettes etc. I
believe base R could have a piping operator so packages can use a pipe in