search for: subaddressing

Hi, I've seen this ISDN subaddress feature added to libpri. Which countries are using it ? How is this billed ? Do you have to pay an extra to your telco to benefit from this subaddresses ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090925/da0771bb/attachment.htm

Hello! With many MTAs it is possible to use a special form of adressing: subaddresses or "plussed addresses". For sendmail you can read some information on http://www.sendmail.org/m4/misc_features.html http://www.unix.org.ua/orelly/networking/sendmail/ch24_04.htm#SML2-CH-24-SECT-4-3 In a sieve filter you can analyse these special detail values, the syntax is described in RFC3598

Hello Stephan, Maybe this is not an issue at all and nothing but a curiosity; maybe though you do care: When there is only a local part in "To", the "subaddress" extension does not match on the "detail" part. This happened when I made a device on the LAN send to "name+foo", where "name" is a system account on the computer used as smtp. Such

Hi there, Dovecot's LMTP implementation and Pigeonhole Sieve already do support the <user><delimiter><suffix> format. RfC 5233, the Sieve subaddress extension, also offers <prefix><delimiter><user>. Could Docecot's LMTP and Pigeonhole be extended to that effect? Thanks & greetings, Paul

Hi, I've just upgraded from 1.2 to 2.0.12 via debian sid packages. I think I've moved all my config over to the new directory-based structure and most things are working, but the subaddress extension in sieve doesn't seem to do anything anymore. It doesn't report an error, but any rules which use it are just ignored. Other sieve rules which don't use subaddress seem to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, first of all, please reply private as I am not subscribed to the list. But if this question takes to much traffic I can subscribe. My problem is that I have to use procmail (as it can call external programs) which finally calls deliver. My main rules are sieve and they work find except that I cannot use subaddress matching in envelope to (not

...conf. So I did that. I'm running 2.0.13 of dovecot, and pigeonhole 0.2.3 on Solaris 10. Before I dive in and upgrade everything, am I missing something simple? The "test" bit works just fine (and in another account as well), so I think something's just not seeing the detail in subaddressing when mail is delivered (even though it works just fine with sieve-test). Thanks, Sean

Hi, Im on Manjaro linux fully up to date running dovecot 2.3.1-2 pigeonhole 0.5.1-2 All is running well except I am having problems with fileinto - it refuses to use variables, and mailboxexists is also failing for me. Im just dealing with plus addressing - should be simple but the behaviour Im experiencing isnt right. require ["variables", "envelope",

Op 1/3/2018 om 8:49 PM schreef Larry Rosenman: > I'm trying to set an IMAP Flag with the detail part of an address, but getting > an internal error: > > an 3 13:37:27 thebighonker exim[537]: 1eWoqt-00008f-4u <= ler at lerctr.org H=(lrosenman.local) [74.203.163.58]:4650 I=[192.147.25.65]:587 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3 > 84:256 CV=no

...fferent users not at the MTA level, but at at the user level using sieve. That seems very inefficient to me. There are nice tricks you can do with virtual alias maps and pcre within postfix to split email to specific user accounts, which could also accommodate other alias schemes than standard subaddressing (such as yours). Kind regards, Tom

Hi, I have a dovecot 2.3.2.1 instance running here that is getting userdb and passdb data from a SQL database. This was a cyrus server migrated over and all users are happy. All users except one: Said user asked if it would be possible to disable subaddressing (localuser+folder at example.com) again. The setting controlling that is AFAIK the lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox item. My idea was to override that setting for the specific user. I changed the user_query to return no for the user in question and all seems well: # doveadm user test field value us...

Hi, way forward could be like this: 1) Introduce a new config option 'detail_affix' with parameters 'prefix' and 'suffix', defaulting to 'suffix' making sure not to break existing setups using <user><delimiter><suffix> respectively :user<delimiter>:detail format. If 'detail_affix' is switched to 'prefix' the expected

Hello, I have 2 Fritz!Pci cards installed on my system, and I use chan_capi. Recently I tried to work a little bit with sub addressing, and after searching the internet I did not find anything. Can anyone tell me if subaddress is in the called-party field just like the MSN? Or is it passed somewhere else and I cannot receive it. Although I was informed by my TELCO that this feature is enabled

Thanks for that. Turns out it was an issue with exim stripping the local part suffix from the envelope before passing over lmtp to dovecot. Fixed in the exim router config! Although if you turn on trace with spamtest it does result in a crash during mail receipt: lmtp(test at test.net)<7988><cDK3ADztDls0HwAANIsFaQ>: Panic: Unsupported 0x30 specifier starting at #38 in 'extracted

I'm trying to set an IMAP Flag with the detail part of an address, but getting an internal error: an 3 13:37:27 thebighonker exim[537]: 1eWoqt-00008f-4u <= ler at lerctr.org H=(lrosenman.local) [74.203.163.58]:4650 I=[192.147.25.65]:587 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3 84:256 CV=no SNI="smtp.lerctr.org" A=dovecot_login:ler S=769 id=20180103193716.oofszdaxopnkgfvd at

Hello, First of all, happy new year! I?ve recently configured my mail server and was using a simple sieve rule in order to store all my ?user+pattern at example.com? ingoing email to be stored in the INBOX/pattern folder. This setup worked very well. I restarted my server this morning (don?t know if it?s related?) and since Dovecot keep storing my emails in INBOX with following errors: root at

Op 30-5-2018 om 14:01 schreef Barry Pearce: > Hi, > > Im on Manjaro linux fully up to date running > > dovecot 2.3.1-2 > pigeonhole 0.5.1-2 > > > All is running well except I am having problems with fileinto - it > refuses to use variables, and mailboxexists is also failing for me. > > Im just dealing with plus addressing - should be simple but the

Send this to dovecot at dovecot.org, not dovecot-owner at dovecot.org On 14.3.2012, at 4.45, paul wrote: > HI. I have just started to play with sieve and everything seems ok when > logging on using telnet localhost 4190 and an encoded username/password. > If I try to connect with firefox at localhost:4190 I get > "IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot Pigeonhole" >

Hello, When an account overquota happens, a log is generated: /var/lib/imap/sieve/username/dovecot.sieve.log Is there a way to prevent this? My `dovecot -n` : ################################################################################ # 2.0.6 (a7d99b69523a): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.35-23-server x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS auth_master_user_separator = * auth_mechanisms =

...t;Sent" IMAP folder, and >> these >> messages arrive unread. I would like to mark them as read using >> Sieve. > > er, I guess, "message is in a particular mailbox" is meaning it > to be > spooled, or something like that, right? > > Do you use subaddressing (aka +addressing, +detail addressing)? > Then look > here: > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples#Plus_Addressed_mail_filtering > > If you want to resolve the question in the second paragraphe, > search the > mailing list archive about how to get the name of...