search for: subaddress

Hi, I've seen this ISDN subaddress feature added to libpri. Which countries are using it ? How is this billed ? Do you have to pay an extra to your telco to benefit from this subaddresses ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachm...

Hello! With many MTAs it is possible to use a special form of adressing: subaddresses or "plussed addresses". For sendmail you can read some information on http://www.sendmail.org/m4/misc_features.html http://www.unix.org.ua/orelly/networking/sendmail/ch24_04.htm#SML2-CH-24-SECT-4-3 In a sieve filter you can analyse these special detail values, the syntax is described...

Hello Stephan, Maybe this is not an issue at all and nothing but a curiosity; maybe though you do care: When there is only a local part in "To", the "subaddress" extension does not match on the "detail" part. This happened when I made a device on the LAN send to "name+foo", where "name" is a system account on the computer used as smtp. Such mail gets filed into INBOX. Matching the whole address against "name+foo...

Hi there, Dovecot's LMTP implementation and Pigeonhole Sieve already do support the <user><delimiter><suffix> format. RfC 5233, the Sieve subaddress extension, also offers <prefix><delimiter><user>. Could Docecot's LMTP and Pigeonhole be extended to that effect? Thanks & greetings, Paul

Hi, I've just upgraded from 1.2 to 2.0.12 via debian sid packages. I think I've moved all my config over to the new directory-based structure and most things are working, but the subaddress extension in sieve doesn't seem to do anything anymore. It doesn't report an error, but any rules which use it are just ignored. Other sieve rules which don't use subaddress seem to work ok. Here's my config: # 2.0.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 x86_6...

...of all, please reply private as I am not subscribed to the list. But if this question takes to much traffic I can subscribe. My problem is that I have to use procmail (as it can call external programs) which finally calls deliver. My main rules are sieve and they work find except that I cannot use subaddress matching in envelope to (not envelope send which has been addressed earlier). But As I use the '+'-Feature the envelope to will be the one interesting for me. For example, I am subscribed to the mailing list gimp-devel with klaus+gdev at ethgen.de. So I want to use: require ["filei...

...finally got around to setting up a second account, to start figuring out how I want to do some plus address filtering. In a nutshell, I want to put mail for foo+bar in foo's 'bar' folder. That's in the wiki. I did this: require ["fileinto", "envelope", "subaddress"]; if header :contains "subject" ["test"] { fileinto "Test"; } if envelope :detail "to" "test" { fileinto "test"; stop; } So, this fails miserably. No error message, nothing in the logs, no nothing. Yet, when I run sieve-te...

...xcept I am having problems with fileinto - it refuses to use variables, and mailboxexists is also failing for me. Im just dealing with plus addressing - should be simple but the behaviour Im experiencing isnt right. require ["variables", "envelope", "fileinto", "subaddress", "mailbox"]; if envelope :matches :detail "to" "*" { set :lower "name" "${1}"; } fileinto :create "folder3"; This works, but changing the last line to: fileinto :create "${name}"; fails and files into inbox. As does:...

Op 1/3/2018 om 8:49 PM schreef Larry Rosenman: > I'm trying to set an IMAP Flag with the detail part of an address, but getting > an internal error: > > an 3 13:37:27 thebighonker exim[537]: 1eWoqt-00008f-4u <= ler at lerctr.org H=(lrosenman.local) [74.203.163.58]:4650 I=[192.147.25.65]:587 P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3 > 84:256 CV=no

...fferent users not at the MTA level, but at at the user level using sieve. That seems very inefficient to me. There are nice tricks you can do with virtual alias maps and pcre within postfix to split email to specific user accounts, which could also accommodate other alias schemes than standard subaddressing (such as yours). Kind regards, Tom

Hi, I have a dovecot 2.3.2.1 instance running here that is getting userdb and passdb data from a SQL database. This was a cyrus server migrated over and all users are happy. All users except one: Said user asked if it would be possible to disable subaddressing (localuser+folder at example.com) again. The setting controlling that is AFAIK the lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox item. My idea was to override that setting for the specific user. I changed the user_query to return no for the user in question and all seems well: # doveadm user test field value...

...respectively :detail<delimiter>:user. 2) Add documentation to the Wiki https://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP: * detail_affix = suffix 3) Add description to the relevant default config files?: # The separator that is expected between the :user and :detail # address parts introduced by the subaddress extension. This may # also be a sequence of characters (e.g. '--'). The current # implementation looks for the separator from the left of the # localpart and uses the first one encountered. The :user part is # left of the separator and the :detail part is right. This setting...

Hello, I have 2 Fritz!Pci cards installed on my system, and I use chan_capi. Recently I tried to work a little bit with sub addressing, and after searching the internet I did not find anything. Can anyone tell me if subaddress is in the called-party field just like the MSN? Or is it passed somewhere else and I cannot receive it. Although I was informed by my TELCO that this feature is enabled on my line I still cant make it work. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......

...fileinto - it > refuses to use variables, and mailboxexists is also failing for me. > > Im just dealing with plus addressing - should be simple but the > behaviour Im experiencing isnt right. > > require ["variables", "envelope", "fileinto", "subaddress", > "mailbox"]; > if envelope :matches :detail "to" "*" { > set :lower "name" "${1}"; > } > fileinto :create "folder3"; > > > This works, but changing the last line to: > > fil...

...(UIDs 127797..127797) .dovecot.sieve points to master.sieve (below), and the rest of the scripts (including master.sieve) are at http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/sieve. require ["fileinto","imap4flags","include","mailbox", "envelope","subaddress","variables"]; require "vnd.dovecot.debug"; global "MyFlags"; if envelope :detail "to" "freebsd" { addflag "FreeBSD"; addflag "MyFlags" "FreeBSD"; } if envelope :matches :detail "to" "*"...

...<20180101111353.C332C25386 at server.example.com>: failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX/${1}': Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX/${1}. Sieve script: root at server:~# cat /var/mail/vhosts/example.com/ludovic/sieve/roundcube.sieve require ["envelope","fileinto","subaddress"]; if header :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES" { fileinto "Junk"; } if envelope :detail :matches "to" "*" { fileinto "INBOX/${1}"; } # rule:[contact] if allof (header :contains "to" "contact at example.com") { filei...

...leinto - it > refuses to use variables, and mailboxexists is also failing for me. > > Im just dealing with plus addressing - should be simple but the > behaviour Im experiencing isnt right. > > require ["variables", "envelope", "fileinto", "subaddress", > "mailbox"]; > if envelope :matches :detail "to" "*" { > ? ? set :lower "name" "${1}"; > } > fileinto :create "folder3"; > > > This works, but changing the last line to: > > fil...

...seems ok when > logging on using telnet localhost 4190 and an encoded username/password. > If I try to connect with firefox at localhost:4190 I get > "IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot Pigeonhole" > "SIEVE" "fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress > comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include > variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave" > "NOTIFY" "mailto" > "SASL" "PLAIN LOGIN" > "STARTTLS" > "VERSION" "1.0" >...

...uvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ01234567890.-_@= auth_worker_max_count = 10 disable_plaintext_auth = no listen = server.com login_greeting = K8 IMAP/POP3 server mail_gid = dovemail mail_plugins = " quota" mail_uid = dovemail managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include imapflags notify mmap_disable = yes passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql-master.conf.ext driver = sql master = yes pass = yes } plugin { autocreate...

...t;Sent" IMAP folder, and >> these >> messages arrive unread. I would like to mark them as read using >> Sieve. > > er, I guess, "message is in a particular mailbox" is meaning it > to be > spooled, or something like that, right? > > Do you use subaddressing (aka +addressing, +detail addressing)? > Then look > here: > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples#Plus_Addressed_mail_filtering > > If you want to resolve the question in the second paragraphe, > search the > mailing list archive about how to get the name...